A law in Texas banning abortions from as early as six weeks into pregnancy will come into effect from today. It is being regarded as one of the most restrictive laws in the United States.
Named the ‘Heartbeat Act’, the newly introduced law has set out to ban abortions from the moment a foetal heartbeat can be detected.
Anti-abortion campaigners have used the existence of a ‘foetal heartbeat’ to support the law’s introduction – however, medical authorities have called it a misleading way to measure early stages of development.
Women’s rights groups, Planned Parenthood, and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) banded together to file an emergency appeal against the proposal of the new law, but the Supreme Court had not responded in time to block it.
According to the ACLU, 90% of abortions take place after the six week period in Texas. That means that from today, millions of women looking to terminate their pregnancy will be stripped of the right to a safe facility in which to do so.
President Joe Biden has slammed the Supreme Court for not addressing the new law, saying it ‘unleashes constitutional chaos.’ It can still be overturned in the future, but only after it is properly reviewed by them.
In 1973, the Supreme Court made a landmark decision in support of women’s rights, known as Roe v. Wade.
The ruling, which still stands today, protects women’s autonomy by allowing them the freedom to have an abortion without facing ‘excessive government restrictions.’
It was a monumental moment for women and a huge stepping stone in the fight for equality, specifically in terms of having governance over their own bodies and lives.
Under Roe v. Wade, women observed the right to terminate their pregnancy up until 22 to 24 weeks. As a standard practice, abortions are not allowed after this stage as the foetus is able to survive outside of the womb.
Why is the new law causing a stir?
Under Texas’ ‘Heartbeat Act’ abortions taking place after being pregnant for only six weeks will be illegal.
What is concerning is that most women do not yet know they are pregnant at such an early stage – so this window of opportunity in the event of an unwanted or unexpected pregnancy is likely to be missed.
Making matters worse, the basis of the law – which relies on the timing of a ‘detectable heartbeat’ – has been scrutinised by doctors at The American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
According to the ACOG, the sound and movement being observed at this stage is ‘a portion of the foetal tissue that will become the heart as the embryo develops’ – in short, it’s not exactly a fully formed heart yet.
On top of its shaky scientific foundation, the act will allow individuals to start a lawsuit against anyone who ‘aids or abets’ an abortion past this time frame.
This means that even if a person hasn’t been directly affected or harmed by an abortion performed after six weeks of pregnancy, they still have a right to sue any other person for getting or providing one.
While exceptions for abortions carried out past six weeks will be permitted in the event of an emergency (so as long as written proof is provided by a doctor), Texas’ new law does not permit termination of pregnancies that are a result of instances of rape or incest.
Clinics in Texas have already stated that they would comply with the strict ruling as a matter of legality, although it is ‘contrary to their best medical practices.’
The Supreme Court’s ruling overnight is an unprecedented assault on constitutional rights under Roe v. Wade. Complete strangers will now be empowered to inject themselves in the most private of health decisions. The law does not even allow exceptions in cases of rape or incest.
We are all aware that making certain actions illegal does not stop them from happening altogether.
So when it comes to healthcare in particular, placing restrictions on complex procedures could see women risking their lives by getting them in underground facilities by unskilled, but willing practitioners.
The World Health Organisation reported that 73.3 million abortions occurred each year throughout the period of 2015-2019. At least one in three of these were carried out in dangerous conditions.
Taking the legal route, those living in Texas will need to travel out of state if they wish to terminate a pregnancy after six weeks – a journey that means traveling a minimum of 399km.
Although this is possible, it will require financial resources, transportation, and extra time – which only create further obstacles for women looking to get the help they need.
On Wednesday, Joe Biden condemned the new law and reaffirmed his stance on women’s rights by saying: ‘this extreme Texas law blatantly violates the constitutional right established under Roe v Wade and upheld as a precedent for nearly half a century.’
It remains unclear whether the ‘Heartbeat Act’ will be reviewed by the Supreme Court, but considering abortion has been a controversial topic in the US for decades – the conversation around it will not end anytime soon.
So, does the new law in Texas violate women’s constitutional rights? You decide.
Deputy Editor & Content Partnership ManagerLondon, UK
I’m Jessica (She/Her). I’m the Deputy Editor & Content Partnership Manager at Thred. Originally from the island of Bermuda, I specialise in writing about ocean health and marine conservation, but you can also find me delving into pop culture, health and wellness, plus sustainability in the beauty and fashion industries. Follow me on Twitter, LinkedIn and drop me some ideas/feedback via email.
Actor Jason Bateman recently caught heat for telling Charli XCX she might change her opinion on not wanting kids. Why are we still inferring that happily coupled, child-free women are unfulfilled?
I’d like to think we’ve made some strides in the motherhood conversation – and to some extent we have. But I still feel the tail winds of disappointment when I tell my elders there’ll be no children on the...
The ongoing Winter Olympic Games have seen many acts of defiance against the Trump administration. How will the situation play out when the US hosts in 2028?
When Baron Pierre de Coubertin revived the Olympics in 1896, one of his main aims was to promote mutual understanding among athletes. He believed that competing on the track instead of the battlefield could encourage peace and help prevent war.
However, countless...
Anxiety, depression, and emotional problems are on the rise across the globe, cutting across boundaries of culture, geography, and socio-economic status. The World Health Organisation says ‘one in seven’ have a mental health disorder in 2026.
According to the World Health Organisation, ‘one in seven adolescents worldwide has a mental health disorder.’ Such statistics obviously cannot be ignored.
This generation of teens is the first to be raised in an...
Why has the precedent that ‘British culture is dying’ invaded every aspect of our lives recently? From TikTok commentary to culture-war politics, who is really influencing the supposed shift in British culture?
Claims that Muslims and BAME communities are erasing British culture have become a popular rhetoric in recent political spheres in the UK, but also around the Global North as a whole. Popular, but not new.
Here's my take...
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.
0 comments
