Menu Menu
[gtranslate]

New research suggests fungi may be communicating with ‘words’

As if they weren’t magical enough, scientists have discovered that mushrooms are potentially talking to each other using a bountiful vocabulary which bears a striking structural similarity to human speech.

If you aren’t a stranger to my writing, by now I’m sure you’re well aware of my deep-rooted obsession with all thing’s mycelium, my fascination towards which recently peaked after seeing the incredible Fantastic Fungi documentary on Netflix (certainly give it a watch if you haven’t already).

Of the many eye-opening facts that were brought to my attention during this viewing, one stood out to me in particular: that of fungi’s ability to communicate.

According to renowned mycologist Paul Stamets, they do so through chemical signals delivered along an underground network so vast there are 300 miles of these branches – which share the same design as the world wide web if you’re needing a mental image – beneath every single step we take.

It gets better, however, because as if they weren’t magical enough, scientists have just discovered that not only are mushrooms able to interact, but that they may be talking to each other using a bountiful vocabulary of up to 50 ‘words’ which bear a striking structural similarity to human speech.

This might come as a surprise, given that fungi are the most common species on Earth. If they were anything other than silent, relatively self-contained organisms, you’d assume we wouldn’t even hear ourselves think.

The finding makes a great deal of sense on the back of previous research which proved them to be ‘speaking’ in order to share information about food or injury with distant parts of themselves. It’s also how they explore their surroundings, tip off fellow fungi to potential threats, and make their presence known to other members of their cluster, much like wolves howling to alert the pack.

Mathematically analysing how they conduct these electrical impulses through their long filamentous hyphae, the professor leading the study could identify patterns resembling our etymology.

‘We do not know if there is a direct relationship between spiking patterns in fungi and human speech – possibly not,’ says Andrew Adamatzky. ‘On the other hand, there are many similarities in information processing in living substrates of different classes, families and species. I was just curious to compare.’

Injecting tiny microelectrodes into the mycelia of enoki, split gill, ghost, and caterpillar fungi, Adamatzky noted that the spikes this experiment generated often clustered into trains of activity, distributing complex (and improbably random) ‘sentences.’

Yet despite how intriguing this is, scepticism remains, and more evidence is required before this type of cognitive behaviour is officially accepted as a form of language that isn’t solely being heard by psychedelic adventurers on mind-altering trips.

‘This new paper detects rhythmic patterns in electric signals, of a similar frequency as the nutrient pulses we found,’ says bioscience professor and fungal biology researcher, Dan Bebber.

‘Though interesting, the interpretation as language seems somewhat overenthusiastic, and would require far more research and testing of critical hypotheses before we see ‘Fungus’ on Google Translate.’

Accessibility