Over 25 million creators now use SoundCloud. With so much music available, are algorithms the solution to finding the next pop sensation?
Algorithms are now accepted as an integral part of the digital world.
They determine what pops up on our social media feeds, allocate tailored advertisements, and are useful in solving our most complex problems.
The music industry is having a tough time navigating these new, uncharted digital waters, however. Where it was once normal to find talent via agents at gigs and shows, we now rely on platforms like SoundCloud and YouTube to find the next up-and-coming star.
Plenty of big names have been discovered by chance this way – Justin Bieber, Billie Eilish, Kehlani, Chance the Rapper, Post Malone – the list continues to grow.
This ease of gaining exposure online enables virtually anyone to find their way into the music sphere. This is where the troubles begin.
SoundCloud has a reputation for hosting thousands of notoriously bad tracks due to its lack of gatekeeping. But that hasn’t stopped it from becoming a top streaming platform.
It remains a central avenue for rappers, singers, and producers looking for their big break.
The platform is heavily oversaturated and for labels wanting their next big money-maker, sorting through all those tracks is an impossible nightmare. Signing a handful of artists in hopes that one will become majorly successful is also a gamble.
The solution? Algorithms.
A new software called Musiio has been developed to run on streaming services, scanning through thousands of songs, and categorising them according to genre. Musiio is also capable of finding similarities between a demo online and an existing top-charting hit.
Other algorithms are trained to process patterns in digital data, where large amounts of online activity can indicate a trending artist. For example, where a song is used on TikTok millions of times, or high engagement on an emerging artist’s YouTube video.
The software is named Sodatone and can also detect mentions on music blogs, high booking numbers for venues, and the number of times a track is included on playlists or charts. Promo from influencers is also significant to help labels find upcoming artists.
While this type of technology has only emerged in the last three years, AI and algorithms have been part of the music listening experience for many more.
Think about your ‘Discover Weekly’ playlist, or the much anticipated ‘Spotify Unwrapped’ that analyses your annual listening habits.
These custom-made playlists gather tons of data on your listening habits to recommend more music that fits your tastes.
The use of algorithms in the streaming industry has been contested often. For example, if artists know a song only needs to be played for 30 seconds to count as a play, then of course they’ll start placing some of their album’s best moments at the start of a track.
In other cases, bias has been highlighted as a problem for music algorithms. As always, whoever codes the algorithm will unwittingly incorporate some of their own bias into it, meaning that racial and gender biases exist within.
A study on recommendation algorithms showed that apps like Spotify are more likely to suggest male artists over female artists. However, these biases can be removed, once correctly identified, and addressed.
When algorithms are left to discover artists who make music synonymous with the current Top 40, are we at risk of hearing nothing but the same thing repeatedly?
Probably not, because this has already been happening in popular music for years.
Many believe that while algorithm use is on the rise within the music industry, they aren’t going to completely takeover just yet.
There are limitations to what AI can do with music. Popular genres such as pop, indie, trap, and UK grime are easily detected, but niche types of cultural music still can’t be well sorted.
When it comes to culture and arts – both very subjective experiences – it sounds like a human touch is necessary to find true talent. At least for now.
Deputy Editor & Content Partnership ManagerLondon, UK
I’m Jessica (She/Her). I’m the Deputy Editor & Content Partnership Manager at Thred. Originally from the island of Bermuda, I specialise in writing about ocean health and marine conservation, but you can also find me delving into pop culture, health and wellness, plus sustainability in the beauty and fashion industries. Follow me on Twitter, LinkedIn and drop me some ideas/feedback via email.
AI-generated audio pornography and sex podcasts are ranking highly on Spotify and explicit video clips are being easily concealed from safeguards. The platform’s reactive moderation is under fire.
Sex sells, we all know that. But what business does porn have being on the biggest music streaming app?
Technically, sexually explicit content is prohibited on Spotify, but the app has a funny way of enforcing this rule. When porn is flagged by...
Fresh research from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Media Lab suggests that frequent use of ChatGPT to write essays might be linked to cognitive decline.
It turns out that using ChatGPT every day to write essays and perform literary tasks may be having a negative impact on our brains.
New research from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Media Lab involved measuring the electrical activity of three different groups of people.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogcSQ-cFRVM&
All three...
As more of us turn to social media for recommendations, is the joy of a hidden gem at risk of extinction?
I used to have a thing for secrecy, at least when it came to food. I revelled in the smug satisfaction of knowing about a low-lit bar that only opens two days a week, or the ramen place tucked behind a dry cleaners that doesn’t accept card. I believed...
US President Donald Trump has unveiled a new gold smartphone and nationwide service network, fittingly titled ‘Trump Mobile.’ The business initiative raises questions about conflict of interest.
The Trump Organisation has just announced ‘Trump Mobile,’ a new smartphone line and monthly network plan that is set to cost $499 USD upfront with a $47.75 USD monthly charge on top.
Each ‘Trump Mobile’ phone is cased in a gold material, and...
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok