A policy which banned animal testing for cosmetic products in 1998 could be reversed to verify the safety of popular ingredients in makeup and skincare.
Animal testing has been considered a controversial practice since the 1960s.
While it is generally accepted in global scientific research for the purpose of developing prescription medicine, using live creatures to test the safety of beauty products is largely viewed as unethical.
For that reason, more than forty countries – including every country in the EU – have banned or strictly limited cosmetic animal testing.
Despite this, over half a million animals are used for this purpose each year in places such as the USA and China.
Last year, The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) suggested that two substances only found in cosmetic products need to be tested to see if they are safe for humans.
To satisfy chemical regulations put in place by the ECHA, a German firm called Symrise carried out animal tests for the pair of chemicals, once of which acts as a UV filter.
Technically, this was a breach of the EU’s policy which restricts animal testing for cosmetics – but it was allowed to go ahead in the interest of public health.
Now, ministers are considering softening current animal testing bans in the UK to align itself with the EU’s new chemical regulations.
The decision has been met with anger and disappointment from campaigners who had previously labelled the UK as a leader in animal rights and protection policies.
The charity Cruelty Free International (CFI) has called reverting to ‘cruel and unjustifiable’ animal testing a ‘mockery of the country’s quest to be at the cutting edge of research and innovation’.
There are roughly 100 cosmetics-only ingredients that could need safety checks under ECHA’s regulations – meaning thousands of animals could suffer in the process.
Although Brexit means that the UK is no longer required to adhere to EU standards, it wouldn’t be unreasonable to assume the government will follow its neighbour’s standards regarding health and safety in the future.
The fact that the products we lather onto our faces everyday may contain unregulated and potentially harmful chemicals is worrying.
At the same time, most can agree that our own vanity shouldn’t mean subjecting other living beings to a life of harmful testing regimes within the stressful environment of a laboratory.
Animal testing on cosmetics to be bought back post Brexit.
This was made illegal by the UK Labour government proposal to the EU nearly 25 years ago.
Truthfully, there is no reason to regress back to animal testing.
In fact, 84 percent of people surveyed in 2020 said they would not buy a product if they knew it was tested on animals.
Many beauty brands already pride themselves on being cruelty-free, using natural ingredients or requesting human volunteers to test products in their developmental stages.
The UK’s adherence to the EU’s regulations is not yet set in stone, but we can all play our part in resisting unethical practices by avoiding products that take part in them.
You can find a comprehensive and regularly updated list of cruelty-free beauty brands here. And why not check out this guide to choosing cruelty-free beauty products by CocoKind while you’re at it?
I’m Jessica (She/Her). Originally from Bermuda, I moved to London to get a Master’s degree in Media & Communications and now write for Thred to spread the word about positive social change, specifically ocean health and marine conservation. You can also find me dipping my toes into other subjects like pop culture, health, wellness, style, and beauty. Follow me on Twitter, LinkedIn and drop me some ideas/feedback via email.
‘Designer vagina’ surgery is one of the fastest growing cosmetic procedures among young people worldwide. Recent research has uncovered that this is due to a lack of education and diverse representation.
It’s never been easier to look at a vagina.
In the digital age – unless parental controls are active – a quick dig through the less-regulated social media platforms like Twitter and Reddit will bombard users with a torrent of...
Though people are discussing it openly online and trends have emerged to address it, our ability to concentrate is deteriorating by the day. Why does nobody seem that concerned?
Two things I’ve noticed recently – both while commuting to work.
For one, that all I ever seem to see these days is people looking down, staring blankly at the screen in their hands.
I’m by no means exempt from this, I...
The unlikely trend has made ear safety stylish. What’s the harm?
The soundtrack of your teens and twenties usually involves crowded festivals, loud nightclubs, and headphones dialled up to high-volume.
But Gen Z are starting to reject this cacophony with help from an unlikely accessory: the earplug.
Studies have shown that for many young people, noise exposure poses a serious risk to the health of the ears and can even lead...
Women are disproportionately suffering from a lack of medical attention, facing difficulties seeking treatment for painful symptoms and having their needs misunderstood. In a supposedly developed world, we are consistently letting women down by failing to close the gender health gap.
From Queen Elizabeth I’s white face makeup – which she used to cover smallpox scarring – to well-known modern-day lipstick brands including Mac, L’Oreal, and Maybelline,...
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok
0 comments
