Menu Menu
[gtranslate]

Why cycling has to be the future of travel

Getting people to switch from cars to bikes won’t be an easy feat, but if achieved, it would create positive change for the planet, our health, and overall quality of life.

In certain parts of the world, cycling is the norm for the majority of the population.

The city of Amsterdam has more bikes than people, with residents cycling an average distance of 2.6km every day. After living there for two years, I can tell you first hand that bikes are king – with the few cars that are on the road routinely making way for them.

A new study at the University of Southern Denmark suggests that if the global population began to cycle as much as the Dutch, annual carbon emissions would be reduced by 686 million tons. That figure is larger than the total emissions of countries such as Australia, Canada, Saudi Arabia, and the UK.

According to Statista, global emissions from the transport sector come in at 7.3 billion metric tons a year. Passenger cars make up almost half of those emissions when aviation is not included in the figure.

With such a simple and obvious solution, why don’t we all just take up cycling to slow global heating? Well, like most things related to climate change, it’s not so straightforward.

How countries can get their citizens pedalling

Firstly, bikes aren’t cheap. Not everyone will have the disposable income required to invest in one. Even a basic, decent-quality pedal bike starts at around £250.

The solution? Well, money via government subsidiaries would be a great place to start – and some countries are already making significant strides.

As part of its national climate change policy, France is giving citizens from low-income areas €4,000 when they trade in their cars and switch to e-bikes for travel. Those earning higher incomes can apply for smaller grants.

With France’s ambitious mission to get 9 percent of its population to switch to bicycles within the next two years – 27 percent of people in the Netherlands already have – President Emmanuel Macron has also invested €250 million to make its capital city, Paris, completely bikeable.

This is a core problem for places like London, where cycle routes aren’t available in every borough. As I am, many will be scared shitless to share the road with double-decker buses, opting to hand over around £1k to Transport for London every year.

That said, a £338 million project to build cycle lanes and pedestrianise roads in England has already been confirmed, after the number of people willing to bike across cities rose during the pandemic.

Okay, so assuming this all gets done in dozens of countries around the road, we’ll all have shiny new bikes and safer roads to cycle them on. What else is in it for us?

Reaping the social benefits

The health benefits of cycling speak for themselves, with studies suggesting that people who cycle to work are 45 percent less likely to develop cancer or cardiovascular disease.

It’s a low-impact form of exercise, making it gentle on joints and easy to adopt at any age. Not to mention, exercise boosts endorphins – those delightful happy chemicals in your brain – and you’ll probably prefer feeling the breeze in your hair over sitting on a sweaty bus or subway for 30+ minutes. Unless you’re Andrew Tate, in which case that privilege does not apply.

Could this be the reason the Dutch mark their quality of life an average 8 out of 10?

Though cycling may not be practical for those with disabilities or families with young children who need to be driven, the increased option for adults and young people to cycle safely will incite major change. Thanks to less exhaust from traffic, air will be cleaner, and we’ll breathe more easily.

It’s difficult to argue with the case made time and time again for making our planet more cycle friendly. The social, economic, and environmental benefits stretch well beyond the points I’ve made here – so what are we waiting for?

Accessibility