Menu Menu
[gtranslate]

Music made with AI will be eligible for a Grammy

To better reflect an evolving industry, artists using machine learning for their compositions now have the opportunity to win an award. However, as stressed by Harvey Mason Jr. – CEO of the Recording Academy – only the human creators who contributed to a song can be nominated.

Last month, the Recording Academy announced a series of changes to the Grammy Awards to better reflect an ever-evolving music industry.

Of those newly introduced guidelines, protocols involving technological advancements in machine learning made headlines.

‘AI, or music that contains AI-created elements is absolutely eligible for entry and for consideration for Grammy nomination,’ Harvey Mason Jr. told the Associated Press when the updated rules were announced.

It comes on the back of AI’s exponential rise in popularity with the advancement in and easier access to AI tools, including voice models. A prime example is the AI-generated Drake song featuring The Weeknd called Heart on My Sleeve, which recently went viral on TikTok and gained millions of views.

In short, artists using artificial intelligence for their compositions now have the opportunity to win an award.

Could a robot win a Grammy? AI music is eligible — sort of

However, as stressed by Mason this week – following discussions with the US copyright office – only the human creators who contributed to a song can be nominated and work containing no human authorship will not be eligible in any category.

This means that if the lead vocals of a record are performed through an AI programme, or a programme that allows for voice modelling, it will be ineligible in a performance category but eligible in a songwriting one because that’s where there is the most significant human contribution.

Conversely, if a song was sung by an actual human in the studio, and they did all the performing, but AI wrote the lyric or the track, the song would not be eligible in a composition or a songwriting category.

To establish this framework, the Recording Academy engaged in extensive research, including holding informational tech summits. This has apparently helped them set stronger parameters around the new rule for performance, songwriting, and composition categories.

‘We don’t want to see technology replace human creativity,’ said Mason.

‘We want to make sure technology is enhancing, embellishing, or additive to human creativity. So that’s why we took this particular stand in this award cycle.’

On this note, the Recording Academy will not be giving a nomination or an award to an AI computer or someone who just prompted AI, rather artists who meet the ‘de minimis’ involvement criteria and are careful about crediting their respective contributions.

Recognising the various creative processes that go into making great music (namely songwriting, contribution, production, and performance), the Recording Academy is approaching this from the standpoint of ‘what the possibilities can be, as opposed to trying to ban it or block it or prevent it, because you can’t.’

Their hope is that this stance will prepare the annual ceremony for AI’s rapid growth in the industry, which is set to unequivocally shape its future.

Though it’s impossible to predict what’s submitted, Mason affirms that ‘people are using the technology. I’m imagining it’s going to be involved in a lot of records a lot of songs this year, so we’ll see if some of them get nominated or not, but I’m sure there’ll be some that will be submitted.’

Accessibility