Menu Menu
[gtranslate]

Is accessible news making Gen Z narrow-minded?

With young people getting most of their news from social media, their political interests are being swayed by algorithms and a limited exposure to diverse perspectives.

In recent years, the number of people for whom social media is their go-to news source has soared, with 44 per cent of 16 to 24-year-olds using Instagram for this very reason.

These platforms โ€“ originally intended to be for meme-sharing and photo-posting alone โ€“ are now overrun with current affairs and political content, which is fostering an interest among users and which they can repost to their stories if, of course, they agree with it.

On the one hand, this is a good thing, especially for those less likely (or with less time) to scour digital publications, find the right (or Left) political podcasts to listen to, or, if theyโ€™re feeling particularly antique, thumb through a newspaper.

By choosing โ€˜donโ€™t limitโ€™ instead of โ€˜limitโ€™ in Instagramโ€™s settings, you can guarantee that political content is enabled and will show up on your feed, as well as scroll through news thatโ€™s trending the highest.

So you can rest easy in the knowledge that you have a better idea of whatโ€™s going on now than you did before picking up your phone.

Thanks to the acceleration of our everyday lives in line with the system of telos-oriented capitalist production that we all live under, however, engaging with politics this way is undoubtedly a privilege โ€“ and a risky one at that.

This is because, on the other hand, algorithms work by offering you the content that youโ€™re most likely to โ€˜like,โ€™ which means youโ€™ll probably see the same accounts crop up again and again.

This might feel vindicating, I get it. Personally I would much rather consume feminist analysis than anything from an incel.

But through being presented exclusively the news we want to see, in a manner thatโ€™s suitable for fast-paced consumption, most of us arenโ€™t being incentivised to explore our own avenues of knowledge and have our opinions changed.

Take the recent general election in the UK, for example.

Of the Gen Zers I know, most voted Green, which was heavily endorsed through Brat memes. Obviously, many had their (valid) reasons, one being the partyโ€™s support for self-identification, โ€˜so that trans and non-binary people could be legally recognised in their chosen gender through self-declaration.โ€™

On the surface, then, it seems like social media is helping to facilitate democracy, allowing users who have the freedom to choose who to vote for to share which way theyโ€™re leaning across the various platforms they use.

Yet this also means that many donโ€™t bother looking beyond the appealing infographics and accessible headlines that influence their decisions.

As a result, though many young people believe theyโ€™re making an informed political choice because theyโ€™ve seen a post about trans rights with the Green party logo in shade โ€˜Bratโ€™, this choice is based on limited information because thatโ€™s whatโ€™s most available to them.

In a similar vein, accounts like @shityoushouldcareabout and @ukfactcheckpolitics are both extremely popular due to the short-form content they post about current news or affairs.

The former, known for sharing celebrity gossip and โ€˜mundane pollsโ€™ has several million followers.

The latter has just under eight hundred thousand, proof that users often prefer it when their content is digestible and โ€˜bite sized,โ€™ rather than a direct call to action.

The issue with this, is that lighter content presented as the thing you should care about not only creates echo chambers that limit exposure to diverse perspectives, but has become a substitute for genuine political engagement amongst netizens everywhere.

Ultimately, Iโ€™m not saying that we should consume only political content. After all, the overconsumption of negative news is whatโ€™s led to compassion fatigue in the first place.

Nor am I saying that engaging with the world through these platforms is inherently bad.

We simply need to be pursuing what weโ€™re interested in โ€“ to be seeking out our own knowledge for both the joy of learning and to be able to do something good with it.

Educating ourselves on the things that are important shouldnโ€™t be reduced to a 1080x 1080xp square, and activism shouldnโ€™t be something we can scroll past.

Having the time to truly engage with the things that matter starts with checking-in and engaging with ourselves.

In a capitalist system which doesnโ€™t afford us any time to pursue what weโ€™re passionate about if it doesnโ€™t bring us monetary remuneration, we need to create the time to learn about the things that are important to us, and to reintroduce ourselves to a prioritisation of people over profit thatโ€™s been lost in the midst of memes and screens.

Accessibility