Menu Menu
[gtranslate]

The paradox of vintage fashion hauls

Gen Z may have an affinity for second-hand clothing, but that won’t change their longstanding love of overconsumption. 

When I was growing up in rural England, second-hand shopping meant reluctantly traipsing around a charity shop with my mum and hoping nobody from school spotted me. The clothes smelt like damp and usually had more than one dubious stain. Needless to say, it wasn’t the height of fashion.

Things started to change when I became a teenager and social media took off. Tumblr was huge back then, and with it came a sudden wave of young nostalgia. We had visual moodboards of periods we hadn’t been alive for, or at least hadn’t been old enough to consciously absorb.

Now everyone wanted to dress like Effie from Skins, or Claire Standish from The Breakfast Club. Many of my weekends during the last two years of school were spent in the same musky charity shops I’d avoided years earlier – only this time I was flanked by an army of friends, all of us hungry for unique finds and bargain deals.

Second-hand clothing has been growing in popularity ever since, bolstered by a widespread interest in sustainable consumption (particularly amongst Gen Z). To cater for this shift, websites have sprung up to replace the tiresome exercise of charity or thrift shopping – with brands like Vinted and Depop making it easy to source vintage pieces at the touch of a button (while make money on your own old clothes).

Vestiare Collective sent second-hand fashion into the arena of luxury branding. And Vinterior ensured we could shop for pre-loved homeware and furniture – always highly curated and re-sold at a premium.

Thrifting is no longer a subculture or a necessity. It’s become a lifestyle in its own right. But as preloved clothing becomes more and more ‘in vogue’, it also inches away from its sustainable function as an antidote to fast fashion. Thanks to social media, our penchant for indulging (very publicly) in trends has swept vintage shopping into the same cycle of overconsumption that – for many at least – it once stood in opposition to.

Across Instagram and TikTok, vintage ‘hauls’ have become a genre of their own, blending the thrill of hunting for unique pieces with the hyper-shareable language of consumerism.

@samm.young I almost cried when I found those boots for $5 😭 #thrifthaul #fashiontiktok #vintagestyle #shop925 #sale @Shop925 ♬ Yukon x Up hunnybee – IG: djhunnybee

As Haley Marie writes, this wasteful behaviour is often excused in the context of second-hand fashion, because the positives ostensibly outweigh the negatives.

‘Ever since I worked in a resale shop in my teens I’ve treated clothing as disposable. I always told myself that since I was buying secondhand clothes and reselling them, I could consume as much as I wanted. This led to almost never repeating an outfit and really unsustainable habits.’

Marie’s behaviour was bolstered by the arrival of YouTube, which allowed her to share this overconsumption for social and financial gain.

The term ‘haul’ is often associated with fast fashion giants like Shein or Zara. On TikTok alone, the hashtag has over 17.6million posts, most of which feature influencers frantically unpacking bags and bags of clothing – most of which they intend to return.

In the UK, customers return £7bn of online purchases each year. This phenomenon has led many retailers to enforce fees for returns, or block customer accounts with a a high returns-rate. We assume that the pieces we send back are resold to the next person. But in reality, if an item is not in perfect condition, there’s a delay in the shipping or processing, or you keep it for a while before returning, it’s likely never resold.

According to one logistics firm, the carbon dioxide cost of returns in the US is the ‘equivalent to the output of 3m cars.’

Vintage clothing is meant to be an antidote to this problem, but it’s now being consumed at the same speed and urgency as fast fashion.

‘Online, secondhand and vintage shopping has become both competitive and performative – a status symbol shaped by algorithms and trending aesthetics,’ says Yawen Yuan.

@linmixonthetrack♬ original sound – Linmix

‘The rush lies not just in what you wear, but how you found it: scoring a ‘deal’, beating others to it and replying to a compliment with ‘Thanks, it’s vintage.’

Combine this with Gen Z’s already healthy appetite for haul culture online, and you’ve got a recipe for overconsumption. This – no matter how you frame it – is never good for the planet.

‘While many Gen Zers are conscious of overproduction of fashion and its impact on the planet, it’s a constant ‘push pull’ between how they say they want to consume and their actual behaviour,’ says Julia Peterson, senior insights strategist at US-based youth culture agency Archrival.

Apps like Depop and The RealReal are exacerbating this trend, with highly gamified interfaces complete with push notifications, limited-time sales and ‘just dropped’ features that drive purchase urgency similarly to your average e-tailer.

The labor of secondhand shopping once acted as a natural speed bump to overconsumption. You had to work for the good stuff. Now, with curated feeds and algorithmic suggestions, everything is a click away.

The truth is, social media is hardwired to reward excess. The more we buy, the more we post; the more we post, the more we influence; the more we influence, the more we’re shown – and ultimately sold.

There’s no easy route out of this cycle. But maybe the solution lies not in what we buy, but how we think. Fashion writers like Orsella De’Castro have reframed our clothing as an extension of the self, an object with a biography that maps various moments in our lives.

Thinking about the things we consume in this way forces a slow, un-performative, and inherently personal approach. Considering how long we wear something, the lives it has lived before it stepped into ours, and how deeply we weave it into our lives – all of these things are what make owning an item of clothing really rewarding.

Accessibility