A policy which banned animal testing for cosmetic products in 1998 could be reversed to verify the safety of popular ingredients in makeup and skincare.
Animal testing has been considered a controversial practice since the 1960s.
While it is generally accepted in global scientific research for the purpose of developing prescription medicine, using live creatures to test the safety of beauty products is largely viewed as unethical.
For that reason, more than forty countries – including every country in the EU – have banned or strictly limited cosmetic animal testing.
Despite this, over half a million animals are used for this purpose each year in places such as the USA and China.
Last year, The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) suggested that two substances only found in cosmetic products need to be tested to see if they are safe for humans.
To satisfy chemical regulations put in place by the ECHA, a German firm called Symrise carried out animal tests for the pair of chemicals, once of which acts as a UV filter.
Technically, this was a breach of the EU’s policy which restricts animal testing for cosmetics – but it was allowed to go ahead in the interest of public health.
Now, ministers are considering softening current animal testing bans in the UK to align itself with the EU’s new chemical regulations.
The decision has been met with anger and disappointment from campaigners who had previously labelled the UK as a leader in animal rights and protection policies.
The charity Cruelty Free International (CFI) has called reverting to ‘cruel and unjustifiable’ animal testing a ‘mockery of the country’s quest to be at the cutting edge of research and innovation’.
There are roughly 100 cosmetics-only ingredients that could need safety checks under ECHA’s regulations – meaning thousands of animals could suffer in the process.
Although Brexit means that the UK is no longer required to adhere to EU standards, it wouldn’t be unreasonable to assume the government will follow its neighbour’s standards regarding health and safety in the future.
The fact that the products we lather onto our faces everyday may contain unregulated and potentially harmful chemicals is worrying.
At the same time, most can agree that our own vanity shouldn’t mean subjecting other living beings to a life of harmful testing regimes within the stressful environment of a laboratory.
Animal testing on cosmetics to be bought back post Brexit.
This was made illegal by the UK Labour government proposal to the EU nearly 25 years ago.
Truthfully, there is no reason to regress back to animal testing.
In fact, 84 percent of people surveyed in 2020 said they would not buy a product if they knew it was tested on animals.
Many beauty brands already pride themselves on being cruelty-free, using natural ingredients or requesting human volunteers to test products in their developmental stages.
The UK’s adherence to the EU’s regulations is not yet set in stone, but we can all play our part in resisting unethical practices by avoiding products that take part in them.
You can find a comprehensive and regularly updated list of cruelty-free beauty brands here. And why not check out this guide to choosing cruelty-free beauty products by CocoKind while you’re at it?
Deputy Editor & Content Partnership ManagerLondon, UK
I’m Jessica (She/Her). I’m the Deputy Editor & Content Partnership Manager at Thred. Originally from the island of Bermuda, I specialise in writing about ocean health and marine conservation, but you can also find me delving into pop culture, health and wellness, plus sustainability in the beauty and fashion industries. Follow me on Twitter, LinkedIn and drop me some ideas/feedback via email.
With a utilitarian focus on what food can do for us rather than how it tastes, coupled with a growing aversion to the humble doggy bag, have we forgotten what it means to appreciate the things that contribute to our wellbeing and keep us alive?
A stroll through the aisles of most supermarkets these days presents a blaze of similarly shaped fonts, all advertising one key nutrient in our groceries:...
Reports have found that synthetic fibres contain dangerous and carcinogenic chemicals.
A Consumer Reports study has found that the ingredients used in synthetic hair across a range of popular brands – including Magic Fingers, Sensationnel and Shake-N-Go, have the potential to cause cancer.
Braids have been the site of care and resistance for centuries within the Black community, serving as protection from the heat and other environmental factors. This follows a rich...
German sportswear company Adidas took home $692 million USD in the first quarter of this year, beating original predictions. It is largely due to strong demand for its ‘classic’ shoe range.
Adidas surpasses expectations with its first quarterly financial report, jumping up in profits by 82%. The company earned a net profit of $692 million USD.
This number is better than initial predictions, which pitched a profit of $546 million...
Thanks to health conscious Gen Z and their elder Millennial comrades, the wellness industry is booming like never before. But could this obsessive fixation on optimizing our health be making us sick in the long run?
I recently came across a video by an fitness creator that left me pretty perplexed, to say the least. The creator was a few weeks into following a new diet as part of her...
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok
0 Comments
