Should we mix politics and sports?

And what about the many other countries taking part in the event?

Iran participated despite protests over Mahsa Amini’s death. The Unites States’ has issues such as gun control and the criminalisation of abortion. Saudi Arabia’s victory against Argentina was celebrated despite also having their own human rights problems.

Previous hosts were never critiqued, like Japan’s policies against asylum seekers, Brazil actively cutting down the Amazon rainforest, and Germany being the EU’s largest greenhouse gas emitter in 2008.

Sports and politics have always crossed paths, like Tommie Smith and John Carlos raising black-gloved fists at the 1968 Olympic games in Mexico City and Paul Pogba and Amad Diallo raising a Palestinian flag after a Premier League match.

A recent example is football players and staff taking a knee before their game starts as a statement against racism.

The gesture was first used in 2016, when American footballer Colin Kaepernick took a knee during the national anthem, saying he couldn’t show pride in a country that oppressed Black people.

Premiere League players began taking a knee before matches in 2020 after the death of George Floyd, and while football fans across Europe tend to support the gesture, some disagree on whether it’s helping to tackle racism.

Crystal Palace’s Wilfried Zaha was the first Premier League player to stop taking a knee, feeling that it had lost some significance and some players would still receive abuse regardless. The director of the Championship club Queens Park Rangers also thought that the “message has been lost” from the act and equated to it a social media hashtag.

It didn’t help that Rashford, Sancho and Saka received racial abuse after they missed their penalties in the Euro 2020 final. While the Premier League’s captains also decided to no longer take a knee and only do so for “significant moments”.

If the players received abuse regardless, what help does mixing politics and sports give?

After Putin invaded Ukraine, sporting bodies from around the world excluded Russia from sporting events, including football, rugby, tennis, Formula 1 and the Summer and Winter Olympics.

But is it fair that the players have to pay the price for something they have nothing to do with?

While boycotting Russia might be symbolic, a cultural boycott will do something that political and economic sanctions won’t be able to do – isolate the country. Preventing Russia from taking part undermines the macho-nationalist image that Putin has worked hard to make. And if ordinary Russians can no longer enjoy the sports they love to watch, their tolerance for the government will fade away.

There’s also an entirely different issue when politics goes too far.

Pakistan and India have always had the most intense rivalry in cricket. Their matches are known for their intensity and are considered one of the biggest matches across the globe. But this stems from tense relations between the two nations from the Partition of British India in 1947, the Indo-Pakistani Wars and the Kashmir conflict.

What happened over 70 years ago is taken out onto the pitch since both countries share a heritage for cricket, and often, many cricket fans have had what’s been described as a “strong response” when there’s a game.

Most recently, tensions escalated between the Indian and Pakistani communities in Leicester, with violence and a series of protests after the 2022 Asia Cup match between the two in August. Leading to the city’s Muslim and Hindu leaders issuing a joint message calling for the riots to end.

How can an ordinary game be enjoyed if the game’s entire perspective is built on political issues?

But if sports fans don’t expect athletes and other sporting bodies to voice their opinions on political issues, then sports will always be a part of society that “lags behind” in progress. And if fans refuse to acknowledge the political nature of sports, then there won’t be a way to recognise and fix these issues.

Political symbols, like social media, have always been used to create conversations. The racial abuse Black football players received in 2021 shows that we need to do more to put an end to racism, especially relating to the sport. These symbols are here to remind fans about what’s happening in the world, but it shouldn’t transcend to rioting and creating differences that affect an entire match’s viewpoint.

Sports have always been a symbol of unity, while politics have always been associated with division – it’s hard to see what many might view as two drastically different things colliding.

But as Kenan Malik says, sports doesn’t exist in a vacuum; social and political contexts shape the sport and our response to it.