Economics can be a tricky thing to get your head around, but comparing prices of Big Mac’s around the world can help.
This week, The Economist published its yearly Big Mac Index, which compares prices of McDonald’s favourite burger between countries and values their currencies accordingly.
The report suggests that New Zealand’s currency is weaker than it should be and that China’s GDP is bigger than the World Bank currently believes.
You might not think it possible to fully grasp currency values and exchange rates using a Big Mac, but it’s actually been a popular method employed by economists for decades. First invented in 1986, The Economist describes it as a ‘light-hearted guide to whether currencies are at their correct level’ and has been featured regularly ever since.
The index is based on an economic theory called purchasing power parity (PPP) whereby currencies are compared using a ‘basket of goods’ that consists of various products and services. If the same basket of goods cost $100 in the US and £200 in the UK, for example, then the purchasing power parity exchange rate is 1 to 2. The Big Mac Index uses this model, but the ‘basket of goods’ is just a Bic Mac.
To get the exact exchange rate between two countries, you need to divide one country’s Big Mac price with another. This resulting number is then compared to the actual exchange rate between the two countries, and if the Big Mac exchange rate is higher then the first country’s currency is overvalued. Still with me?
This approach has been labelled as ‘burgeronomics’ which sounds a little like something out of a SpongeBob skit but is very real. You can view The Economist’s in-depth tool here to see different currency values from around the world. It also makes me hungry, which is not something I ever thought I’d associated with in-depth economic charts.
Is this a good model to use?
Big Macs are used because they’re one of the most internationally understood products – nearly every nation on Earth has its own version with few variations. It’s also never gone out of style and is still relevant today, allowing yearly comparisons that help to better understand currency fluctuations.
It’s not a perfect system, however. McDonalds as a brand is valued differently from country to country. In some nations it’s considered a cheaper fast food option, whereas in places such as Norway an average meal is valued at over $20. This isn’t necessarily a reflection of each countries inflation rates or currencies values, but rather McDonalds’ differing market status in separate places.
Big Macs also vary in price within a country. Buying one in London will be more expensive than, say, rural Devon, and the Bic Mac Index doesn’t take into account other factors like production costs, transport costs, and advertising budgets that will affect the overall price of a burger outside of currency rates.
It is a useful and accessible system for people who aren’t the most clued up on economic systems though, of which I am guilty. The Big Mac is also one of the most sensible products to create this comparison despite some of its flaws, as you’ll be hard pressed to find many other items or services that are available nearly everywhere.
Next time you pop into your local fast food place you may want to ponder on the value your burger has in the wider context of your country’s economic status. Or choose the vegan option, which is definitely preferred in our books.
I’m Charlie (He/Him), a Remote Writer at Thred. I was previously the Editor at Thred before moving to Bristol in 2024. As a music and gaming enthusiast, I’m a nerd for pop culture. You can find me curating playlists, designing article headline images, and sipping cider on a Thursday. Follow me on Twitter, LinkedIn and drop me some ideas/feedback via email.
Multiple subreddits are banning X links in protest of Elon Musk’s salute at the presidential inauguration. The implosion of ideological groupthink online highlights the fascinating potential of digital community.
Elon Musk was one of a number of tech-giants who took center stage at Donald Trump’s second presidential inauguration. The X owner and Tesla founder has become an unlikely political sidekick (or partner in crime, if you prefer) since the latter...
In Kashmir, savoury pink tea is a staple. But outside the valley, it’s been rebranded into something sweeter, almost sparking a quiet identity crisis. Let’s unpack the history, evolution, and brewing debate over what makes nun chai truly Kashmiri (hint: it’s salt).
‘Bas bas! Main itna nahi kha paungi! (Enough, I won’t be able to eat so much)’ I protested in Urdu, watching in dismay as my delicate cup of...
You can try and deny it, but we love laughing in the face of innocent scam victims. The more elaborate the scam, the louder the taunts. But at a time when anti-bullying agendas are everywhere, why are we so quick to mock the internet's most vulnerable?
A very shoddy photoshop job went viral last week. The series of images featured Brad Pitt in various states of ill health; undergoing surgery,...
A court has ruled that five elephants from Colorado zoo are not people after an animal rights group argued that they were effectively imprisoned.
A court has ruled that elephants are not legally regarded as people.
This bizarre judgement is the result of an ongoing bid to free five elephants from Cheyenne Mountain Zoo in Colorado. Named Missy, Kimba, Lucky, LouLou and Jambo, an animal rights group called The Nonhuman...
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok