The 30×30 initiative aims to designate at least 30% of all land and oceans as ‘protected areas’ by 2030. The target was first created in 2019, with over seventy nations agreeing to participate.
As you’re no doubt aware, our oceans are under serious threat as climate change becomes more severe.
There are a ton of problems we face in the next few decades, including ocean acidification, mounting plastic pollution, degrading coral reefs, and melting sea ice, just to name a few.
To help combat these ever-pressing issues, countries around the globe have agreed to take part in the 30×30 conservation initiative, which aims to protect 30% of all the world’s oceans and land by 2030.
The ocean part of this promise will be done – in theory – by creating a global network of marine protected areas, ensuring a legal safeguard for the most vulnerable spots in our seas. Currently only 2.7% of the ocean is within ‘highly protected zones’ that have strong regulations intended to safeguard biodiversity.
What this means in practice is that 30% of all our oceans cannot be used for any destructive or disruptive purposes. This would include fishing, mining, and anything pollutive. No waste would be dumped in these areas and they would remain virtually untouched, left to thrive without human intervention.
Of course, all that is well and good theoretically, but may be harder to enforce safely in real terms.
Policing such a huge area of the planet’s oceans would be near on impossible, and it’s inevitable that some pollution, fishing, and other activities would continue to take place illegally.
It would also cause significant disruption for Indigenous people who rely on land and ocean resources to live and thrive. Labelling huge swathes of land and sea as protected areas could trigger mass evictions and create permanent rifts in longstanding communities.
In 2021, 49 philanthropic organisations signed an open letter to the 30×30 initiative leaders and the UN, warning that a poorly implemented plan could pave the way for human rights abuse and echo past colonial legacies of Indigenous dispossession.
Resources are being allocated to this cause, however, with some impressive financial backing coming from some extremely wealthy people – including Jeff Bezos himself.
In a statement one month after this open letter was published, Bezos was quick to stress that Indigenous people and local communities will be considered through a ‘new generation of programs’, that ‘focus on livelihoods [with] incentives that offer better paths to prosperity’.
Alongside the ex-Amazon CEO, eight other grant makers have promised $5 billion as part of the ‘Protecting Our Planet Challenge’. While it may sound like a dodgy YouTube challenge, this project is intended to kick start the 30×30 initiative and get the ball genuinely rolling on protecting the planet.
All other grant makers have promised similar co-operation with Indigenous communities, though this will not be an easy task to do on such a large scale. These backers include Arcadia, Bloomberg Philanthropies, Nia Tero, Re:wild, and the Rob and Melani Walton Foundation, among others.
Despite these challenges and obstacles, which are very real and immediate, the necessity for ocean conservation is undeniable and pressing.
More than 3 billion people currently rely on the ocean for their livelihoods, and 2.4 billion people live along marine coastlines. If things continue as they are, irreversibly damaged marine ecosystems will destroy economic security for a huge chunk of the global population.
It’s not just people, either. Emissions can be significantly reduced if we improve the health of our oceans.
Seagrass beds, salt marshes, mangroves, and associated food webs all sequester carbon dioxide from the atmosphere at up to five times that of tropical forests. Trees have been out here taking all the limelight – but the sea is also vital for emission reduction.
Scientists back the numbers and insist that we must have 30% of our oceans highly protected by 2030 via ‘Marine Protected Areas’. It’s the road to get there that remains bumpy, as local and international communities face sudden, disruptive change.
I’m Charlie (He/Him), Deputy Editor and Senior Writer at Thred. I was previously the Editor full time at Thred before moving to Bristol in 2024. As a music and gaming enthusiast, I’m a nerd for pop culture. You can find me curating playlists, designing article headline images, and sipping cider on a Thursday. Follow me on LinkedIn and drop me some ideas/feedback via email.
A new study challenges the years’ worth of negative media portrayal of GLP-1, revealing its potential benefits in treating and preventing substance use disorders.
In these past few years, GLP-1 has become the centerpiece of cultural renaissance.
Discovered in the early ‘80s, the hormone was solely developed to treat Type 2 diabetes, with the first FDA approved variant being approved years later in 2005.
Coincidentally, during the early clinical...
Thousands of flights were cancelled on Monday as air travel faced major disruption following US-Israeli strikes. The Trump administration has indicated that upheaval could last another four weeks.
Global air travel has faced major disruption as a result of the US-Israel war on Iran this week, with thousands of flights cancelled and passengers stranded.
According to The Guardian, airline and travel share prices have fallen sharply after several days of...
As US intervention rhetoric intensifies and Latin America faces renewed political pressure, leaders from across the global left gathered in Bogotá to defend sovereignty, environmental justice, and a vision of unity rooted in José Martí’s century old call for Nuestra América.
2026 began with Venezuela’s president and wife were arrested in the middle of the night and imprisoned in New York.
Before that, US bombs had targeted civilian shipping crafts. Right...
Gen Z are skewing data on household debt, as young buyers continue to lean significantly more on credit facilities than their elders.
We’re here for a good time, not a long time.
In the UK, debts are rising at their fastest pace for seven months fuelled heavily by an increase in borrowing from Gen Z. Is this young people being irresponsible? Does it speak more to economic strife in the...
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.
0 comments
