Coal, oil, and gas are responsible for 86% of human-caused carbon dioxide emissions in the past 10 years. Will these companies be held accountable?
The city of Baltimore recently won a landmark case against some of the world’s biggest oil and gas companies, attempting to hold them accountable for their role in climate change.
The court’s decision is expected to have a substantial ripple effect on similar lawsuits filed by other U.S. cities and states.
Baltimore, a U.S. city located in the coastal state of Maryland, has witnessed the effects of climate change firsthand with increasing sea level, rainfall, and flooding. The city is now facing tens of millions of dollars in costs related to the associated damages as well as threats to public health.
As each summer brings longer and more severe heat waves, the city is required to upgrade housing and provide cooling centers to combat the increased risk of heat stroke and asthma-related hospital visits.
As a result, the city government argues that major fossil fuel companies like British Petroleum (BP), Shell, and Exxon must help pay for the costs of climate change because they misled the public about how their products contribute to global warming.
What role has the fossil fuel industry played in misinformation?
Following an investigation of Exxon’s engagement in climate science by InsideClimate News, it was found that the oil giant knew of climate change as early as 1977, 11 years before it became a public issue.
After years researching the effects of burning fossil fuels on the climate, Exxon helped found and lead the Global Climate Coalition (GCC), an alliance of big-name companies that actively opposed efforts to curb fossil fuel emissions and challenge the science of global warming and climate action. Members of the GCC also included Shell, BP, Chevron, and the United States Chamber of Commerce.
In June 2021, Keith McCoy, ExxonMobil’s now ex-Director of Federal Relations was interviewed by Greenpeace UK’s investigation unit under the impression he was being head hunted for a new job.
When questioned about the company’s role in climate change he stated “Did we aggressively fight against some of the science? Yes […] Did we join some of these shadow groups to work against some of the early efforts? Yes, that’s true”.
In a congressional hearing in October 2021, panelists questioned the CEOs of Shell, BP, ExxonMobil, and Chevron, all of whom denied the companies’ involvement in misleading the public on climate change.
Currently facing backlash from the public, scientists, and politicians at all levels of government across the United States, said companies are now looking at creative ways to solidify their defence in court.
Oil companies on the defence
Before evidence was able to be presented at the Baltimore case, the fossil fuel companies focused their defense on whether such lawsuits can take place in state courts considering climate change is a global issue that is regulated by the federal government.
Karen Sokol, a law professor who studies climate liability cases, argues that such a defense is unreasonable because the allegations against the companies depend on state laws that are meant to protect the public from misleading marketing.
In Maryland and other states like California and Texas, oil companies are also accused of using scare tactics to intimidate activists, courts, and their opponents engaged in similar lawsuits.
This follows claims made by the companies stating that the allegations made against them could threaten the U.S. oil supply.
In Texas, where ExxonMobil is headquartered, the company is fighting off cities in California who are seeking compensation for wildfires, flooding, and other extreme weather events.
In response to these lawsuits, the company has asked the Texas Supreme Court to allow it to use a law that would enable it to take legal action against these city officials. The company argues that in filing lawsuits against ExxonMobil over its role in the climate crisis, said officials are conspiring against the company’s First Amendment rights (the right to free speech).
Over the coming months, numerous rulings in states such as Maryland, California, and Texas, and at the federal level, will dictate the future of big oil in the United States – the world’s second largest greenhouse gas emitting country.
I’m Ghislaine (She/Her), a writer at Thred. I’m a climate activist and Science Communication Lead at ClimateScience and am always happy to talk all things sustainability. Follow me on Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram and feel free to drop me some ideas/feedback via email.
Britain’s ‘smoke-free generation’ law may save lives, but it also reveals a government legislating for habits young people have largely grown out of.
The British government has hailed its generational smoking ban as a landmark public health intervention. Anyone born after 1st January 2009 will never legally be able to buy cigarettes in the UK, theoretically creating a ‘smoke-free generation’ that will phase tobacco out of British life forever.
It’s...
In a major blow to climate action, the nation’s Justice Minister announced a legislation to ban citizens from suing companies for climate change damage.
In 2016, the Paris Climate Agreement was signed, marking a landmark moment in global cooperation on climate change. Yet, a decade later, the agreement appears to have little real impact around the world.
A strong example of inadequate climate action is currently unfolding in New Zealand, where...
South Africa is regarded as the land of opportunities on the continent, but at this time, there is fear of settling within its borders for African migrants.
In townships and inner-city neighbourhoods, African migrants are once again becoming targets. Caught in a cycle of violence, exclusion, and suspicion, this crisis evokes a familiar sense of unresolved conflict. However, this time around, it goes deeper than mere politics. It’s...
Research has found that most rich people in the UK would be happy to fund public services and pay more income tax, softening fears that millionaires could leave the country due to financial pressures.
It seems as though millionaires in the UK might be more open to higher taxes than previously thought, at least according to new research.
A survey was conducted on behalf of Patriotic Millionaires UK, a network...
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.
0 comments
