Coal, oil, and gas are responsible for 86% of human-caused carbon dioxide emissions in the past 10 years. Will these companies be held accountable?
The city of Baltimore recently won a landmark case against some of the world’s biggest oil and gas companies, attempting to hold them accountable for their role in climate change.
The court’s decision is expected to have a substantial ripple effect on similar lawsuits filed by other U.S. cities and states.
Baltimore, a U.S. city located in the coastal state of Maryland, has witnessed the effects of climate change firsthand with increasing sea level, rainfall, and flooding. The city is now facing tens of millions of dollars in costs related to the associated damages as well as threats to public health.
As each summer brings longer and more severe heat waves, the city is required to upgrade housing and provide cooling centers to combat the increased risk of heat stroke and asthma-related hospital visits.
As a result, the city government argues that major fossil fuel companies like British Petroleum (BP), Shell, and Exxon must help pay for the costs of climate change because they misled the public about how their products contribute to global warming.
What role has the fossil fuel industry played in misinformation?
Following an investigation of Exxon’s engagement in climate science by InsideClimate News, it was found that the oil giant knew of climate change as early as 1977, 11 years before it became a public issue.
After years researching the effects of burning fossil fuels on the climate, Exxon helped found and lead the Global Climate Coalition (GCC), an alliance of big-name companies that actively opposed efforts to curb fossil fuel emissions and challenge the science of global warming and climate action. Members of the GCC also included Shell, BP, Chevron, and the United States Chamber of Commerce.
In June 2021, Keith McCoy, ExxonMobil’s now ex-Director of Federal Relations was interviewed by Greenpeace UK’s investigation unit under the impression he was being head hunted for a new job.
When questioned about the company’s role in climate change he stated “Did we aggressively fight against some of the science? Yes […] Did we join some of these shadow groups to work against some of the early efforts? Yes, that’s true”.
In a congressional hearing in October 2021, panelists questioned the CEOs of Shell, BP, ExxonMobil, and Chevron, all of whom denied the companies’ involvement in misleading the public on climate change.
Currently facing backlash from the public, scientists, and politicians at all levels of government across the United States, said companies are now looking at creative ways to solidify their defence in court.
Oil companies on the defence
Before evidence was able to be presented at the Baltimore case, the fossil fuel companies focused their defense on whether such lawsuits can take place in state courts considering climate change is a global issue that is regulated by the federal government.
Karen Sokol, a law professor who studies climate liability cases, argues that such a defense is unreasonable because the allegations against the companies depend on state laws that are meant to protect the public from misleading marketing.
In Maryland and other states like California and Texas, oil companies are also accused of using scare tactics to intimidate activists, courts, and their opponents engaged in similar lawsuits.
This follows claims made by the companies stating that the allegations made against them could threaten the U.S. oil supply.
In Texas, where ExxonMobil is headquartered, the company is fighting off cities in California who are seeking compensation for wildfires, flooding, and other extreme weather events.
In response to these lawsuits, the company has asked the Texas Supreme Court to allow it to use a law that would enable it to take legal action against these city officials. The company argues that in filing lawsuits against ExxonMobil over its role in the climate crisis, said officials are conspiring against the company’s First Amendment rights (the right to free speech).
Over the coming months, numerous rulings in states such as Maryland, California, and Texas, and at the federal level, will dictate the future of big oil in the United States – the world’s second largest greenhouse gas emitting country.
I’m Ghislaine (She/Her), a writer at Thred. I’m a climate activist and Science Communication Lead at ClimateScience and am always happy to talk all things sustainability. Follow me on Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram and feel free to drop me some ideas/feedback via email.
Thousands of flights were cancelled on Monday as air travel faced major disruption following US-Israeli strikes. The Trump administration has indicated that upheaval could last another four weeks.
Global air travel has faced major disruption as a result of the US-Israel war on Iran this week, with thousands of flights cancelled and passengers stranded.
According to The Guardian, airline and travel share prices have fallen sharply after several days of...
As US intervention rhetoric intensifies and Latin America faces renewed political pressure, leaders from across the global left gathered in Bogotá to defend sovereignty, environmental justice, and a vision of unity rooted in José Martí’s century old call for Nuestra América.
2026 began with Venezuela’s president and wife were arrested in the middle of the night and imprisoned in New York.
Before that, US bombs had targeted civilian shipping crafts. Right...
Gen Z are skewing data on household debt, as young buyers continue to lean significantly more on credit facilities than their elders.
We’re here for a good time, not a long time.
In the UK, debts are rising at their fastest pace for seven months fuelled heavily by an increase in borrowing from Gen Z. Is this young people being irresponsible? Does it speak more to economic strife in the...
During the Russian invasion of Ukraine, thousands of Africans became the target of numerous deceptive recruitment practices, leading to hundreds of deaths.
During this year’s parliamentary intelligence briefing in Kenya, it was reported that over 1,000 nationals, who were lured by the prospect of high-paying jobs, were recruited and deployed to fight with no training and no clarity about their roles.
Such is the case with the ongoing Russia-Ukraine...
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.
0 comments
