Menu Menu
[gtranslate]

Opinion – cynicism shouldn’t be our default setting

For many, it’s a reasonable response to the world – one that our culture engineers. Unless we address its heightened prevalence in modern society and work to collectively move past it, however, our trust in others, mental health, and desire to engage in impactful activism will continue to deteriorate.

In the age of 24-hour news, it’s almost impossible not to be a cynic.

This is because we’ve A, never been more informed of the appalling events ceaselessly taking place across the globe and B, never had worse mental health as a result.

Cynicism doesn’t apply solely to how we react to the state of things, however.

To be afflicted by this ‘disease’ (as experts claim it’s helpful to think of it as) also means living under the assumption that ‘ultimately we’re self-interested beings, and because of that we can’t be trusted to truly have each other’s best interests in mind.’

This is how neuroscientist Jamil Zaki defines it, author of a new book titled: Hope for Cynics: The Surprising Science of Human Goodness.

In his words, modern cynicism is the general theory that ‘overall and at our core people are selfish, greedy, and dishonest.’

Fuelled by this notion and a subsequent unwillingness to be vulnerable or open up, we’re less incentivised to look for connection and community, both of which are well-known to reduce stress, improve sleep, and ward off anxiety, depression, and loneliness.

‘It’s almost like cynical people can’t metabolise the calories of social life, so they end up psychologically malnourished, which is toxic at many different levels,’ adds Zaki.

Though seeing the world through these mud-coloured glasses sounds deeply unpleasant, for the most part it’s become our default setting.

Comment sections on social media are the embodiment of this: cesspools of negativity that expose anyone who chooses to upload a video (regardless of whether it’s commendable or hateful) to the risk of being torn apart by angry users hiding behind their phone screens.

While it may not be as blatant offline, cynicism is still everywhere, from the people we know who always manage to be the voice of doom, to those we don’t who tell anyone who’ll listen that striving to be a conscious citizen is ‘pointless’ because ‘the Earth won’t be here in 50 years anyway.’

And despite the preconception that cynics are better off, they actually tend to exhibit more psychological disorders, suffer from heart disease, and aren’t as resilient as non-cynics in the face of danger.

Now, an advocate for being realistic myself (as long as it doesn’t hurt others of course), I don’t necessarily deem this approach that problematic, given it limits our expectations, prevents us from being let down, and keeps us in check.

Yet as Zaki outlines, there’s a difference between being a cynic and being a sceptic.

‘If cynicism is a theory, what theories do is they structure our perception of the world and often bias our perception of the world,’ he says.

‘If you think that things are a certain way, you’ll pay lots of attention to any information that accords with that perspective and ignore or discount evidence that doesn’t, so you end up through your worldview finding confirmation for it and doubling, tripling, quadrupling down.’

‘Scepticism really doesn’t allow for that. A true sceptic is open to evidence and they’re willing to update even relatively basic assumptions that they have if the evidence comes in on the other side.’

With this in mind, cynicism is the enemy of impactful activism, strengthening the echo chambers that a lot of us are trapped in and providing us with an excuse to refrain from taking tangible action.

Consistently questioning people’s motives may serve us personally day-to-day, but when this leads to a refusal to challenge the corrupt systems that are perpetuating injustice, it’s an issue that affects us all.

Yes, we absolutely have reason to be cynical about the sheer incompetency of those in power to address climate change, inequality, and human rights abuses (to name a few), but if this stops us from speaking out and standing up, then all it does is delay progress – which we simply cannot afford to be doing.

‘In 1972, about half of Americans believed most people can be trusted, and by 2018 that had fallen to a third of Americans,’ says Zaki.

‘We’re experiencing a massive drop in faith in one another and in our institutions, and with that comes a rise in cynicism.’

What he alludes to, is the fact that where once we used to believe that society was broken but worth fighting for, we’re now primarily in denial.

This denial is what’s feeding the repudiation of politics as a democratic value in America, moral paralysis towards the conflicts currently devastating Palestine, Ukraine, and Sudan, and a widespread consensus that adopting eco-friendly habits to protect the planet is hopeless.

In other words, our cynicism isn’t helping anyone.

So, what’s the solution? According to Zaki, shifting not to blind optimism, but to a reciprocity mindset that examines our cynical conclusions and puts others first.

‘The same way that cynical self-fulfilling prophecies bring out the worst in people, when you put faith in people, they know and they step up,’ he says.

‘Another thing that I would recommend is just trying to take more leaps of faith in people. I think we’re too risk-averse in our social lives. We focus too much on what could go wrong and not enough on the relationships we could build.’

‘Taking small and calculated chances on other people is a really powerful way of rebalancing our risk portfolio, opening ourselves up to other people, and also giving them the gift of the chance to show us who they really are.’

I get it, maintaining a positive attitude is nothing short of a slog these days. But if we don’t at least try to confront the bleak logic that so many of us swear by, I dread to imagine what the future holds.

Accessibility