Menu Menu

Is the Russian ‘Z’ campaign genuine or state propaganda?

The letter ‘Z’ has been popping up across Russian media, cities, and on military equipment. Whether it is a genuine movement – and what it actually means – is up for debate.

The International Gymnastics Federation (FIG) has taken disciplinary action against Russian gymnast Ivan Kuliak for showing a letter ‘Z’ while on the medal podium during a World Cup event.

Kuliak was stood next to Ukrainian competitor Illia Kovtun and has insisted he would ‘do it again’. The symbol is considered politically provocative and problematic, as it is synonymous with Russia’s military forces. ‘Z’ has been spotted on tanks, worn by Russian politicians, and been broadcast on social media.

Use of typography in this way makes it much easier for pro-Russian campaigners and advocates to broadcast their political stance. As the BBC highlights in its own piece about the symbol, 60 children and staff in the central Russian city of Kazan were seen standing in a ‘Z’ position outside a hospice this week. The image was widely shared online.

Experts also believe it’s being used by Russian forces to identify one another, ensure they are in correct strategic positions, and prevent accidental friendly fire.

The symbol is considered to be offensive and inappropriate to use outside of Russia, given that nearly the entire world has condemned the conflict and issued heavy economic sanctions. Even Coca Cola, McDonald’s, and Starbucks today announced they would be halting trade in Russia.

While social media has brought attention to the symbol, many political experts also believe it is being sponsored by the Russian state. As analysist Aglaya Snetkov commented ‘it has been pushed by the regime’.

While we can’t be entirely sure of what is happening within Putin’s borders, we do know that Russian civilians are receiving heavily biased, restrictive, and misinformed news on the conflict. Many sites and news resources – such as the BBC, Meduza, and the German broadcaster Deutsche Welle – are blocked.

The state also limits social media use, with a national ban on Facebook and heavily restricted Twitter access. TikTok users in Russia can no longer upload content after a law was passed criminalising ‘false information’ regarding the invasion.

Citizens are barred from expressing contempt for Putin’s regime and face criminal charges if they protest either online or on the streets. For these reasons it is hard to decipher just how popular the symbol really is in Russia and how much of the online ‘buzz’ is a result of sponsored manipulation.


Why do people suspect it’s an organised campaign?

This isn’t the first time Russia has used the internet and online messaging to spread misinformation and cause deliberate confusion.

It has deployed bots to manipulate American voters during elections in the past, especially with the Trump campaign in 2016.

A lengthy report three years ago outlined just how involved Russia was with Western politics last decade, including hacking, staged rallies in Florida and Pennsylvania, and deliberate spreading of false information on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.

The New York Times notes that analysts are certain that the spread of ‘Z’ online is a co-ordinated effort by paid Russian agents. ‘This is definitely a state-induced meme’, explained Vasily Gatov, a Russian-American media analyst based in Boston.

A sizeable group of individuals are given cash to spread ‘Z’ and create a false sense of viral popularity.

We saw parallel behaviour during Trump’s rise to power, whereby bot accounts and paid influencers spread anti-Hillary memes and generated growth on the now defunct subreddit r/The_Donald. This wasn’t the only cause of his victory, of course, but it was a huge contributor.

Accounts already considered suspicious are posting ‘Z’ content. Maria Butina, for example, was deported from the US in 2019 after being found working as an unregistered Russian agent. She herself posted a video drawing the ‘Z’ on her suit jacket.

The Russia-sponsored news broadcaster RT was also spreading the symbol in the UK and US, at least until its ordered shutdown in European countries as of last week. UK Culture Secretary Nadine Dorries described it as ‘Putin’s polluting propaganda machine’.

Other videos of youth flash mobs wearing the ‘Z’ on tees and sweaters are suspiciously similar to clips shared during previous state campaigns, suggesting they aren’t genuine or representative of the wider public opinion in Russia.


How has symbolism historically been used in times of conflict?

Logos and symbols have been used throughout history to represent political agendas or opinions. The most famous of these is the swastika, which some have compared to Russia’s ‘Z’.

However, modern conflict is unique in its use of politically charged, rapid-fire memes. Propaganda can be instantaneously shared and discussed, with ongoing conversation on current events happening in real time. We no longer live in the age of newspaper cartoonists boosting morale for civilians and reinforcing patriotism on a weekly basis.

Ukraine’s official Twitter page shared an image of Putin and Hitler together at the beginning of the invasion, with a warning that ‘this is our reality’. The page had previously shared memes on the tension between the two countries in the preceding weeks.

Logos and symbols have the potential to spread a message very quickly in the age of social media, but are equally susceptible to manipulation or misinterpretation. In a world of ‘post-truth’ it is impossible to identify whether ‘Z’ is an organic, public backed statement from Russians, or simply just a state media strategy.

For now, all we can do is monitor the situation closely.

Accessibility