Is pollution a better way to discuss the climate?
‘My thing is, let’s go and rephrase this and communicate differently about it. Let’s really tell people: we’re talking about pollution. Pollution creates climate change, and pollution kills,’ says Schwarzenegger.
Well, he’s not wrong.
All of what is damaging our planet’s ecosystem is rooted in pollution. From greenhouse gas emissions to plastic and harmful chemicals and dyes, we’re destroying our planet with things created by humans during the last century.
Not to mention, pollution found in our air, water, and land is diminishing human health. Man-made chemicals are now responsible for causing chronic illnesses and disease, with 7 million people dying prematurely from air pollution alone each year.
Explicitly framing the situation as caused by humanity’s decisive actions rather than an event that has simply started happening to our planet could work to reframe the narrative.
Pointing to pollution as the foundation of the problem may also help us identify solutions more easily. It illustrates to us that our current environmental troubles can be resolved if we revert back to basics or implement greener solutions in our everyday life.
These are things slowly but surely being put into motion, such as switching to clean energy, swapping virgin plastics for biomaterials, and replacing toxic chemicals with eco-friendly alternatives.
Still, recent G7 summits and COP meetings continuously fail to produce concrete solutions and solid environmental policies that match the severity of the situation. To quote Greta Thunberg, we’ve mainly seen a lot of ‘blah, blah, blah’.
‘Climate change’ might be too abstract
While the description of CO2 and methane gas particles lingering in our atmosphere and subsequently heating up the Earth might resonate with those most clued up on the subject, it admittedly does little to evoke a sense of urgency within the mind of the average listener. Or world leaders.
Contrarily, those in the Global South have been experiencing first-hand the devastating effects of climate change in recent years. This is despite the fact that they might not describe what they see as due to climate change.
In Accra, Ghana, locals will talk about mountains of fast fashion items polluting their shorelines and landfills. Meanwhile, locals in Bali, Indonesia will point to the growing amount of plastic bottles clogging local rivers and polluting beaches.
In Pakistan, village communities will tell you how monsoons washed away entire neighbourhoods. They will say the water left around them, though abundant, is polluted by sewage and chemicals, and is undrinkable.
To entertain Schwarzenegger’s idea, perhaps we should change the vocabulary in climate conversations to focus on something truly tangible: pollution. It might just allow people to think about our environmental issues – and the solutions to them – with greater clarity and simplicity.
0 comments
