The man who self-immolated
A story that didn’t make as many headlines as it should have occurred on Earth Day this year.
Wynn Bruce, a 50-year-old climate activist, set himself on fire outside the Supreme Court building in Washington DC. Though he did not explain his actions outright or inform anyone of his plans, the man’s social media profiles point to serious concern over climate change and signs of eco-anxiety.
His lifelong commitment to environmental issues and participation in online environmentalism forums made the date of occurrence – in particular to those who knew him – no coincidence.
This isn’t the first time someone self-immolated to draw attention to environmental issues, either.
In 2018, 60-year-old climate activist and civil rights lawyer David Buckel died from injuries caused by self-immolation in a park in Brooklyn, New York.
His mission was clearly explained in an email which he sent to authorities, as well as a backup note left near the site of the fire. Both letters explained how Buckel had set out to protest global inadequate efforts to limit human-caused climate change.
After this happened, The Guardian asked its readers ‘did anyone care?’ and said that judging by a lack of climate action by governments and conglomerates around the world, the sad reality is that not many did.
A five week hunger strike
The latest act of extreme activism took place in Britain over the last week.
Climate activist Angus Rose starved himself for more than five weeks in a bid to get the UK’s energy minister Greg Hands to publicise the written brief given to Boris Johnson before last year’s climate summit, COP26.
Stationed outside the UK parliament building, Rose said he fully expected ministers to ignore his demands and likely let him die, a fate he told MyLondon he would willingly accept.
By the time Rose finally reached a compromise with ministers, he had lost 17kg (37lbs), leaving many supporters and specialists relieved after fearing he was on the brink of suffering from heart failure or sudden death.
‘It’s an interesting question,’ said Rose in relation to the government’s delayed response. ‘Would they have left me there for another week to see what happened? I don’t know.’
According to Rose, this dangerous form of protest in the name of planetary health is one we should expect to see more of.
‘People will be taking increasingly desperate measures because the government’s actions and its policies aren’t consistent with maintaining a habitable planet on which to live,’ he said.
‘So yeah, these are desperate actions, but they are consistent with the risks.’
The climate crisis increases risk of violence
Over the next decade, the worsening climate crisis will cause environmental issues and resource scarcity across the world.
Already, places like Africa, Asia, and the Middle East have seen how environmental issues like droughts, wildfires, floods, and overpopulation have exacerbated already existing violent conflicts.
But as we edge closer to the limit for global heating, is it possible that in places where regular climate protests are taking place, those with environmental concerns will become more extreme in their actions?
And as people feel more helpless in the face of a changing climate, will the list of climate martyrs grow longer?
Truthfully, I hope not. It looks like the actions of those who have sacrificed their lives and personal safety for the environment don’t go unnoticed, but frankly, fail to incite immediate or significant action from politicians and companies.
And as many climate activists have said before: individual actions matter, but it’s the actions of many that will change the world. In a fight as difficult as the one surrounding climate change, we’ll need as many soldiers as we can get.
0 comments
