0 comments
game, selfie, match
Wimbledon is aggressively targeting influencers to try and draw in younger crowds. With demand now surging, the tournament is at risk of losing its authenticity for the sake of the algorithm. Is this a common pitfall of Gen Z social media branding?
With the World Cup currently dominating our news feeds, you’d be forgiven for overlooking this year’s Wimbledon.
Still, despite heavy competition, the prestigious tennis tournament has continued to build on its recent growth in popularity, breaking viewership records across the pond as public interest surges. Queues for tickets have never been longer, with over 300,000 visitors attending in the tournament’s first week alone. Tennis as a sport is expanding year on year too, with over 106 million people now playing tennis across the globe, a 25.6% increase from 2021.
These gains are not by accident. Wimbledon’s marketing director, Usama Al-Qassab, has been explicit about his attempts to reinvent the sport, branching out to influencers, creative brands, and social media channels to draw in younger crowds and encourage a sense of experiential exclusivity. Raw data tells us that this has worked; Usama says that visitors are ‘generally […] about a year younger’ with each passing tournament and the average age of ticket ballot goers has fallen to 35.
Of course, while there are plenty of advantages to modernising a sport that has, at times, been associated with older spectators and stuffy socialites, attracting a younger crowd also brings its own fundamental changes to the atmosphere and vibe of Wimbledon. Critics argue that by prioritising social media engagement, the sport is at risk of being dwarfed by superficial spectacle. Wimbledon is becoming more akin to high-end festivals, where outfits, good pictures, celebrity features, and clean aesthetics start to take priority over the actual sport itself.
This shift has been observed by former players and long-time spectators. Mike Bryan noted that attendees sometimes appear more concerned with filming matches rather than fully engaging with the game at hand, which is leading to a more diluted, subdued atmosphere around the court. Yahoo also reports that older fans feel pushed out by influencers and high-end brands, especially as queues become more crowded and demand increases. The sport is steadily pivoting toward exclusivity, leaving genuine sport fans in a tougher position if they want to attend.
All of these grumbles are valid, but it’s worth remembering that for many live events and public spaces, this is simply a necessity of modern marketing. As we’ve mentioned before, young people crave real-life experiences that feel urgent, limited, and community-driven. Brands that can leverage this need while also catering to social media feeds and opportunities for content will inevitably resonate with Gen Z. We’ve seen this across other industries – not just events – with Stanley Cups perhaps being one of the most high-profile, successful rebrands in recent memory.
When institutions make the deliberate decision to optimise for social media, they inevitably open the door to sweeping changes that usually prioritise different aspects of the experience beyond the main event. This has happened in other sports and industries, not just tennis: Formula 1, most major music festivals, Premier League football teams, and traditional spaces like museums have all had to modernise to cater to a Gen Z crowd. The rewards for this are monetarily huge, and can help to bring an entirely new demographic into otherwise ageing spaces. Without adapting, many organisations risk eventual extinction.
As is the case with Wimbledon, however, this evolution risks putting the actual, core purpose of an institution on the back burner. If everything is optimised for influencers and social media, it could easily lead to a homogenisation of culture, where performative aesthetics outweigh genuine experience and passionate interest. We risk diminishing the cultural value of unique experiences, as more and more events try to capture the same influencer markets and become servants to the ever-present algorithms.
Balancing modern demands with traditional values and identity is a tricky task. Wimbledon has seemingly managed to toe the line so far, though criticism is bubbling.
If it does pull things off for the long haul, it will no doubt continue to capitalise on the current, worldwide uptick in tennis and generate serious brand growth. Other institutions have shown that marketing to Gen Z and focusing on experiences can pay off massively, and we should expect this approach to become ever more commonplace in the coming years. For now, the ball is in Wimbledon’s court… if you don’t mind us making the pun.
See also:
- How a fragmented internet is reshaping Gen Z marketing
- Love Island tanks as Gen Z cools on influencer culture
- The UK shuts down social media for under-16s… what could go wrong?
🌍 Gen Z around the Web
the latest stories in youth culture and changing trends…
Gen Z are powering the investing boom – but are they doing it all wrong? (the times)
Investments are on the up, as more of us ditch cash ISAs and traditional savings accounts thanks to low interest rates and little returns. However, while Gen Z are more likely to begin investing than older generations, they’re also making riskier decisions, with one third diving straight into cryptocurrency with little or no experience. This research comes just as the UK government announces a cap on money that can be put into a cash ISA. Should Gen Z build stronger, longer-term foundations before jumping into high-risk markets? Read more
Why are young people so risk-averse? (wall street journal)
We’ve all seen the reports and studies that suggest Gen Z are less likely to take risks than their parents did, with fewer young people drinking alcohol, staying out late, or socialising. What gives? This piece asks students which factors they think are shaping Gen Z attitudes. The usual suspects are mentioned here: phones, harsh job markets, and overprotective parents are all cited as major reasons. Economic uncertainty and intense social pressures make risks feel… well… riskier. Are we shocked? Read more
Gen Z judges you by your first name more than any other generation (vice)
A new study by Talker Research has found that almost 30% of Gen Zers admit to making assumptions about someone based on their first name. Yes, this does include some of the obvious worst offenders like Karen, Chad, and Donald, all of which have associations with internet memes and certain orange-faced politicians. While this data might seem trivial, negative connotations with specific names can have very real consequences, such as being barred from job opportunities, for example. Read more
NHS turns to TikTok to counter Gen Z influencer misinformation (the telegraph)
Misinformation thrives on social media, especially TikTok. The medical industry is particularly susceptible to incorrect claims and snake oil salesmen, with pseudo products, podcasts, and ‘experts’ frequently gaining traction online. The NHS has launched its own official channel on TikTok to combat this niche corner of influencer content, posting evidence-based advice and guidance on a wide range of topics. Whether it be the pandemic, general nutrition, or gym advice, we’ve seen how misinformation has affected public health in real terms. Could this be a turning point? Read more
‘Everyone calls Gen Z boring. I’d argue that we’re just incredibly healthy’ (yahoo)
We mentioned earlier that Gen Z are less risky… but is that a bad thing? This piece by a 26-year-old defends the wellness practices that are often associated with young people, such as sleep tracking, wellness apps, and massage tools, and more. This writer cites the growing cancer risks, obesity issues, and other public health problems, and argues that Gen Z is making positive changes that will benefit them long-term. There’s nothing wrong with sobriety, after all. Read more
