Menu Menu
[gtranslate]

How realistic is Keir Starmer’s COP29 pledge?

The Prime Minister’s goals may be loud, but is anyone listening? 

Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s commitment for the UK to slash greenhouse gas emissions by 81% by 2035 at the COP29 climate summit has been hailed by some as a brave push for climate leadership.

The pledge is marginally more ambitious than the current target of a 78% reduction measured against 1990 levels and aligns with recommendations from Britain’s climate advisers.

But beyond bold targets and polished speeches, Starmer’s environmental goals lack much in the way of a ‘how’.

Starmer’s declaration of intent arrives at a time when international climate cooperation teeters on a knife’s edge. Both the United States and China – the world’s largest carbon emitters – did not bother to attend this year’s COP summit in Azerbaijan.

Ahead of a second Trump term, an ominous question mark hangs above climate initiatives. The President-elect has remained vocal about his stance on global warming, repeatedly dismissing plans to invest in the planet and calling out climate change as a hoax on multiple occasions.

During his first term, Trump even pulled the US out of the Paris Agreement.

This alarmist attitude toward environmental policy paints a grave picture for its future.

But despite lofty visions for the years to come, Starmer’s plan to actually carry out changes remains unclear.

When questioned about how such a drastic reduction in emissions would be accomplished without upending the everyday lives of British citizens, his response was disappointingly vague.

‘What we’re not going to do, is start telling people how to live their lives. We’re not going to start dictating to people what they do,’ the Prime Minister said.

But climate action cannot rest on good intentions and platitudes. To meet a target as ambitious as an 81% cut by 2035, profound changes are unavoidable.

It means transforming everything from the energy sector to transportation, agriculture, and industrial processes. It demands billions in investment, innovation, and, inevitably, sacrifice.

Starmer’s hesitation to outline the nuts and bolts of this transition may reflect a desire to avoid political backlash. It’s no secret that public support for climate policies can evaporate quickly when the conversation turns to financial burdens and lifestyle changes.

COP itself has attracted controversy due to the hypocrisy of many attendees. As a meeting point for world leaders, many of whom travel by private jet, the summit is somewhat of a bloated spectacle, marking a parade of speeches and pledges rather than meaningful action.

Particularly striking is the choice of this year’s host, Azerbaijan. The country recently imprisoned Dr. Gubad Ibadoghlu for criticising national policy – including its stance on fossil fuels.

Journalists like Ella Whelan are quick to discredit Starmer’s position in the climate conversation, citing his glamorous private air travel and refusal to address the details of Britain’s green goals.

‘Despite Labour’s keenness to decry private-jet usage as a scourge on the health of mother Earth, Starmer seems fairly keen on the mode of transport – infamously using one to get to a campaign rally in Scotland for clean energy usage,’ Whelan writes.

But it’s worth remembering that Starmer is a politician. Environmental policy is known to alienate the public, particularly when it comes down to rules and costs. Britain faces a recession, a fractured political landscape, and wavering public trust in major institutions.

As Starmer speaks of ambitious targets, households are grappling with energy bills they can barely afford. If the government is going to impart real change – particularly on such a grand scale – it will require a certain level of line toeing.

It is easy to be cynical about ambitious climate goals and summits like COP29. But cynicism is a luxury we cannot afford. Starmer’s target is a reminder of what is necessary to avert climate catastrophe, but its success depends on real action and honest leadership, both in Britain and beyond.

Achieving an 81% cut in emissions will require difficult conversations, practical plans, and unwavering determination. If COP is to remain relevant, and if leaders like Starmer are to deliver on their promises, they must move beyond rhetoric and into the realm of tangible, credible action.

Accessibility