Legal experts are preparing to publish a paper in next year’s Harvard Environmental Law Review. They will argue that fossil fuel companies should be charged with homicide for the deaths they’ve caused by accelerating the climate crisis.
The booming fossil fuel industry continues to be the number one cause of the worsening environmental crisis.
Individuals running these companies have been aware of their actions’ consequences for decades, yet have shown no signs of stopping. In fact, oil and gas ventures have continued to ramp up worldwide, earning top energy company CEOs’ salaries in the billions.
All of this has come at the price of a warming planet, an unpredictable global weather system, mass forced migration, the loss of human lives, and diminished biodiversity. Do they really think they’ll be let off the hook?
Legal action has already been taken against major fossil fuel companies, but authors of the upcoming Harvard Environmental Law Review (HELR) believe that the outcome of these environmental lawsuits have not matched the seriousness of the crimes they address.
Since civil and regulatory rulings are inadequate for holding fossil fuel companies liable for their actions, the authors of the HELR will attempt to build a case based on homicide – stamping the industry as guilty for hundreds of thousands of climate-related deaths.
Let’s first take a look at a recent legal challenge one fossil fuel company has faced.
Last month, Shell’s board of directors was sued by the environmental law charity ClientEarth. The organisation made claims that the fossil fuel company had ‘failed to properly manage risks associated with the climate crisis.’
George Washington University law professor, Donald Braman and David Arkush, a director at the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, write in the Harvard Environmental Law Review that these legal accusations only scratch the surface of their culpability.
They say this because scientists at ExxonMobil had conducted research in the 1970s that predicted their projects would cause rapid global heating with ‘shocking skill and accuracy’. Rather than slow operations, they strengthened ties with political players to campaign for and secure novel fossil fuel projects.
Even as climate change slowly veered to the front of public consciousness, Shell, ExxonMobil, and the like have continued to cover up or downplay these realities. They’ve stayed silent about their climate knowledge while denying the legitimacy of anti-fossil fuel campaigns launched by scientists, activists, and environmentalists.
All of this, of course, has been a tactic to maximise personal profit at the cost of all life on Earth – a cost that is expected to rise to 250,000 human deaths annually between 2030 and 2050.
Homicide wouldn’t be a radical accusation
Looking at the money hoarded by fossil fuel companies will paint a damning and infuriating picture.
Take, for example, the fact that ExxonMobil made £44.8 billion in profits last year – the most it’s ever made in its history. Worse yet, only 5 percent of that massive profit was reinvested in clean energy projects.
Meanwhile, governments around the world were forced to empty their pockets, spending nearly £800 billion on fossil fuel subsidies in order to help citizens pay for their skyrocketing bills as the energy crisis raged on.
When you look at the situation from this angle, you’ll quickly realise that virtually everyone is going broke by paying for energy from fossil fuels as our planet sends life-threatening signals for us to stop burning them.
This is a disturbing display of greed and insanity on the part of people running major fossil fuel companies.
While the HELR is still being drafted, it could spark a monumental move towards enforcing maximum legal punishment for top decision-makers in the oil and gas industry.
In the end, it’s hard to see homicide charges as a radical accusation when these companies continued to operate despite knowing that the continuation of their work would destroy our Earth and all life within it.
Let’s hope the HELR’s research team can find more damning revelations that bolster their legal arguments. It’s time to stop this madness.
I’m Jessica (She/Her). Originally from Bermuda, I moved to London to get a Master’s degree in Media & Communications and now write for Thred to spread the word about positive social change, specifically ocean health and marine conservation. You can also find me dipping my toes into other subjects like pop culture, health, wellness, style, and beauty. Follow me on Twitter, LinkedIn and drop me some ideas/feedback via email.
On Thursday, at a courthouse in Avignon, France, Dominique Pelicot was handed 20 years in prison for aggravated rape following over a decade of drugging and abusing his ex-wife, Gisèle Pelicot, and inviting over 50 men to rape her.
Among the 50 co-defendants, 46 were convicted of rape, two of attempted rape, and two of sexual assault.
The judge handed down sentences ranging from three and 15 years, with a...
As many as forty people between the ages of 22 and 58 will be spending Christmas in UK prisons. This record-breaking figure is attributed to the high number of arrests at climate change protests and demonstrations related to Israel’s actions in Gaza.
This year, a record-breaking number of UK protestors will be spending Christmas behind bars.
With forty activists between the ages of 22 to 58 locked up across Britain in...
The strictest law in Iran's history concerning the compulsory veil was supposed to be enacted on December 13. In a hopeful turn of events, global outrage has forced the administration to hold off on the bill's implementation.
Participating in digital activism in all possible ways - only to rarely witness positive outcomes - may make you wonder, ‘What's the point?’ Recent events in Iran, however, have given us renewed hope...
The controversial technology, which is intended to limit the effects of climate change by reflecting sunlight back into space, might not be such a great idea after all.
As we know, hundreds of the world’s leading climate scientists expect our planet to breach the internationally agreed 1.5C threshold by 2027 and temperatures to rise to at least 2.5C above pre-industrial levels this century.
This is due to emissions...
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok
0 comments
