In the last month alone, two deadly climate change demonstrations have taken place in the US and UK. As most governments remain slow to act on environmental matters, is climate extremism inevitable?
British climate scientist James Lovelock once said that climate change should be viewed as a war, and in war ‘democracy can be put on hold’.
It’s not news to anyone that climate activists have started going great lengths to disturb the status quo, with the sole aim of forcing their governments into environmental action.
Last year, swathes of protestors blocked key UK roads and motorways, and an international climate lawyer literally glued herself to fossil fuel company Shell’s headquarters to condemn their practices.
We also can’t omit how the British counterterrorism police force began warning communities about the rise of extremist groups such as Nazis, Satanists, and climate change activists in 2020. Yes, really.
Not to mention when UK home secretary Priti Patel publicly called members of Extinction Rebellion ‘criminals’ who ‘threaten the nation’s way of life,’ despite the Home Office saying it is wrong to label them as such.
As the environmental situation worsens globally, are instances of extreme climate activism going to become more frequent?
A story that didn’t make as many headlines as it should have occurred on Earth Day this year.
Wynn Bruce, a 50-year-old climate activist, set himself on fire outside the Supreme Court building in Washington DC. Though he did not explain his actions outright or inform anyone of his plans, the man’s social media profiles point to serious concern over climate change and signs of eco-anxiety.
His lifelong commitment to environmental issues and participation in online environmentalism forums made the date of occurrence – in particular to those who knew him – no coincidence.
This guy was my friend. He meditated with our sangha. This act is not suicide. This is a deeply fearless act of compassion to bring attention to climate crisis. We are piecing together info but he had been planning it for atleast one year. #wynnbruce I am so moved. https://t.co/bHoRaLK6Fr
This isn’t the first time someone self-immolated to draw attention to environmental issues, either.
In 2018, 60-year-old climate activist and civil rights lawyer David Buckel died from injuries caused by self-immolation in a park in Brooklyn, New York.
His mission was clearly explained in an email which he sent to authorities, as well as a backup note left near the site of the fire. Both letters explained how Buckel had set out to protest global inadequate efforts to limit human-caused climate change.
After this happened, The Guardian asked its readers ‘did anyone care?’ and said that judging by a lack of climate action by governments and conglomerates around the world, the sad reality is that not many did.
A five week hunger strike
The latest act of extreme activism took place in Britain over the last week.
Climate activist Angus Rose starved himself for more than five weeks in a bid to get the UK’s energy minister Greg Hands to publicise the written brief given to Boris Johnson before last year’s climate summit, COP26.
Stationed outside the UK parliament building, Rose said he fully expected ministers to ignore his demands and likely let him die, a fate he told MyLondon he would willingly accept.
By the time Rose finally reached a compromise with ministers, he had lost 17kg (37lbs), leaving many supporters and specialists relieved after fearing he was on the brink of suffering from heart failure or sudden death.
‘It’s an interesting question,’ said Rose in relation to the government’s delayed response. ‘Would they have left me there for another week to see what happened? I don’t know.’
According to Rose, this dangerous form of protest in the name of planetary health is one we should expect to see more of.
‘People will be taking increasingly desperate measures because the government’s actions and its policies aren’t consistent with maintaining a habitable planet on which to live,’ he said.
‘So yeah, these are desperate actions, but they are consistent with the risks.’
The climate crisis increases risk of violence
Over the next decade, the worsening climate crisis will cause environmental issues and resource scarcity across the world.
Already, places like Africa, Asia, and the Middle East have seen how environmental issues like droughts, wildfires, floods, and overpopulation have exacerbated already existing violent conflicts.
But as we edge closer to the limit for global heating, is it possible that in places where regular climate protests are taking place, those with environmental concerns will become more extreme in their actions?
And as people feel more helpless in the face of a changing climate, will the list of climate martyrs grow longer?
Truthfully, I hope not. It looks like the actions of those who have sacrificed their lives and personal safety for the environment don’t go unnoticed, but frankly, fail to incite immediate or significant action from politicians and companies.
And as many climate activists have said before: individual actions matter, but it’s the actions of many that will change the world. In a fight as difficult as the one surrounding climate change, we’ll need as many soldiers as we can get.
I’m Jessica (She/Her). Originally from Bermuda, I moved to London to get a Master’s degree in Media & Communications and now write for Thred to spread the word about positive social change, specifically ocean health and marine conservation. You can also find me dipping my toes into other subjects like pop culture, health, wellness, style, and beauty. Follow me on Twitter, LinkedIn and drop me some ideas/feedback via email.
‘Would you rather be stuck in the forest with a man or a bear?’ is an intriguing theoretical discussion that’s currently playing out on social media. Met with nearly complete unanimity among women, many men have tellingly reacted with the kind of gaslighting and deflection that’s painfully familiar to survivors of sexual assault.
If you were alone in the forest, would you rather encounter a bear or a man?
This...
The hole in the Earth’s ozone layer is remaining open for longer periods than previously observed. This is exposing penguins, seals, and other animals to heightened levels of harmful UV radiation.
We know that temperatures are rising.
We also know that summer months are becoming warmer and will continue to do so until we phase out fossil fuels and drastically reduce emissions.
For humans, while the impacts of extreme heat can be...
The legislation signed by President Joe Biden allocates $95 billion in emergency spending for aid to Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan. However, critics argue that the aid package reflects US efforts to maintain global leadership amid a potential power grab by China.
In late April, President Joe Biden signed a $95 billion bipartisan emergency spending law to provide aid for US allies Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan.
An estimated $26 billion is...
A US Democrat committee has found that Big Oil deliberately downplayed the dangers of fossil fuels. Its major players have also reportedly lobbied against climate laws they backed publicly for years.
Big Oil is at it yet again. The latest scoop courtesy of US Democrats reveals that fossil fuel giants have long played a shady game of publicly supporting climate initiatives while dismissing them entirely in private. The word greenwashing...
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you agree to use this site, we will assume that you are happy with it! Privacy policyAgree