Menu Menu
[gtranslate]

Why Katy Perry’s space mission is easy to hate

The pop star spent 11 minutes on board a Blue Origin flight to the edge of Earth’s atmosphere, but despite her jubilant reaction, the all-female ‘mission’ hasn’t won-over spectators. 

Everything I know about Katy Perry’s brief time in outer space is against my will. Photos of the pop star – flailing and grinning like a child on a trampoline – have been inescapable all week. She’d been joined by an all-female space crew (a loose term for the star-studded passenger lineup) on a Blue Origin space mission (another loose term for an 11 minute flight to the edge of Earth’s atmosphere).

The highly publicised escapade was widely pitched as a moment of progress – an all-female space crew, helmed by Jeff Bezos’ girlfriend Lauren Sánchez and joined by media darlings like Gayle King. But despite Perry’s jubilant reaction upon touching back down on solid land, the whole ordeal felt like a gender-flavoured distraction from a far less glamorous truth: space tourism, as it currently exists, is a marketing exercise. And a highly destructive one at that.

Blue Origin’s suborbital hop wasn’t a scientific breakthrough or a vital step in exploration. It was a luxury joyride designed to make space sexy for consumers and investors alike. And in 2025, few things are more bankable than celebrity endorsement – bonus points if said endorsement is dressed up in pink-wash feminism.

‘You’ve heard of one small step for man? This was one giant leap backwards for womankind,’ joked Marina Hyde, reporter for The Guardian. ‘What could be more empowering or something than watching Lauren Sánchez make going to space sound like brunch with the girrrrrls.’

Hyde’s words might sound scathing, but she’s not alone in her opinion. Many onlookers were less than amused by Perry and co’s brief venture into space, including model Emily Ratajkowski.

‘This is beyond parody,’ Ratajkowski told her TikTok followers shortly after Blue Origin’s landing had been broadcast courtesy of a sponsored livestream. ‘Saying that you care about Mother Earth and it’s about Mother Earth, and you’re going up in a spaceship that is built and paid for by a company that’s single handedly destroying the planet?’

In the past decade, the space race has morphed from a Cold War-era battle of ideologies into a playground for billionaires. Elon Musk, Richard Branson, Jeff Bezos – men whose companies barely pay taxes – are now the faces of a new cosmic colonialism (I pause here to note that a Blue Origin ticket sold at auction for $28m in 2021).

And while Bezos didn’t go up this time, he didn’t have to. His brand was centre stage. Katy Perry and company were not astronauts but rather zero-gravity influencers.

The problem isn’t just that this kind of space travel is environmentally obscene – though it is. Blue Origin’s New Shepard rocket releases tons of carbon dioxide and water vapour with every launch, contributing to both atmospheric warming and ozone depletion. These flights are, quite literally, burning the sky for entertainment. But the deeper rot lies in the way this recent all-female escapade framed privilege as progress.

When we watch a handful of celebrities – already beneficiaries of immense wealth – float above the Earth in pressurised capsules, we’re not witnessing a leap for womankind.

It’s telling that the backlash came so swiftly. Social media users accused Perry of flaunting wealth and ignoring the climate crisis. After landing and kissing the earth, the singer shared that she felt ‘honoured’ to have taken part in a flight that ‘wasn’t a ride’ but rather a journey. Many were dubious that an 11-minute flight – shorter than the average podcast episode – could be so genuinely transformative.

Despite all my pessimism, this isn’t about denying women access to space. It’s about recognising that space itself has been turned into a sandbox for those who already control the game. The fact that the mission was all-female isn’t irrelevant,  but it’s not redemptive either. (Well actually, it is pretty irrelevant – sorry).

There’s a deeper irony, too, in watching the world’s richest men flee Earth while their companies contribute so heavily to its decline. Climate collapse, wealth inequality, and the erosion of public trust are all problems rooted in the same system that makes space tourism possible.

Individuals like Jeff Bezos are staking a claim in a future where Earth is seen as disposable, and salvation lies off-planet. Blue Origin’s vision isn’t one of human flourishing but rather of gated cosmic communities, where the class divide and chasmic wealth gap prevail.

​​When celebrities sign on to these missions – however earnestly – they help sell that dream. And no matter which way you look at it, whether from space or the cold hard ground, it doesn’t leave a nice taste in your mouth.

Accessibility