Menu Menu
[gtranslate]

The timing of the UK’s Online Safety Act launch is terrible

The sweeping regulation arrives amid notable public mistrust of government and fears surrounding data privacy.

You’ve probably noticed in one way or another that the UK’s Online Safety Act is now in full effect. I, uh, read as much on July 24th.

If you attempt to load up porn websites, certain Reddit pages, or content that runs afoul of ‘child friendly’ on TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, or Snapchat, you’ll be stopped in your tracks by a slew of confusing age verification checks.

There is no uniform way in which to prove your age, with some platforms requesting verification through third party apps, while others have developed creepy AI face tech that estimates your age. The former method, fronted by providers like AgeChecked and VerifyMyAge, is currently most widespread, requiring proof of age in the form of a passport or licence scan, or through connecting to your online banking, among other methods.

The upside of the bill is that children are now more adequately protected on social media, with the platforms now directly responsible – and liable – for content that is posted. If someone underage sees and reports something illicit, the onus is put on the platform to remove it or face potential fines. This includes graphic violence, pornography, or anything encouraging harmful behaviours.

Quite honestly, though, it feels as though the bill should have ended there.

Instead, the legislation spills over into murkier territory, handing sweeping powers to Ofcom and, some would argue, empowering a culture of surveillance under the guise of protection. Even if the Online Safety Act began with noble intentions, it’s now giving the distinct whiff of overreach.

When accessing the social features on your Xbox or Roblox requires the digital equivalent of a nightclub bouncer, the initial intention is lost in a cloud of inconvenience and cynicism. If you check much of the discourse online – provided you can access it – people are concerned the government have underlying motivations that extend beyond an apparent duty of care for young people.

Kier Starmer isn’t incredibly popular at the moment, and people frankly don’t trust that their privacy is upheld online. Between constant reports of our data being handed out to data brokers, hacking operations, and tech tycoons ending up in court for under-table malpractice, there’s a general sense of resignation from the public. Nothing is truly private, and you need to look after yourself.

That feeling of personal agency over the situation has now been eliminated by the Online Safety Act. The available options for everyone in the UK are: hand over your biometrics, your passport details, your banking information, etc, or… say sayonara to a whole strata of the internet. I mean, half the country has no idea how AI even works, but will have their face scans logged somewhere so they can access Reddit. It’s not a stretch to call the operation excessive.

Considering the government once lost confidential military documents on a train and recently oversaw massive NHS data breaches, it’s hard to feel any sense of security and calm about the situation. God only knows what third-party apps have planned for our data, who’s collecting what, where is it stored, and for how long?

Hundreds of thousands of petition signatures have been amassed opposing the bill already, but the government is reportedly undeterred. The staggering rate at which people are also downloading VPNs underscores just how unwilling to comply the public is. If anyone’s winning out of this, it’s these nifty little networks.

The Online Safety Act, however, doesn’t feel safe, secure, or even viable in the long term. If anything, an appropriate description would be dystopic.

Accessibility