Menu Menu
[gtranslate]

How TikTok failed to take down Perez Hilton’s livestream

The celebrity blogger was hospitalised after allegedly harming himself on a TikTok livestream. Now the platform is reckoning with the consequences. 

Last Tuesday, celebrity gossip blogger Perez Hilton (born Mario Armando Lavandeira Jr.) appeared on a TikTok livestream naked, covered in a red substance that appeared to be blood, and holding what looked like a knife. As viewers watched on in horror, a concerned number called the emergency services who quickly arrived at Hilton’s home and hospitalised him.

Hilton’s family have since confirmed the star is stable and recovering. But how did a platform as big as TikTok allow his broadcast to remain online for so long? Representatives for the social media company are now reckoning with the consequences of what is arguably its biggest failing when it comes to duty of care.

TikTok spokesperson Jamie Favazza told WIRED that the platform’s systems had flagged the livestream within minutes of it going online, but a ‘moderation error’ delayed both the removal of the broadcast and the subsequent blocking of Hilton’s account. TikTok also confirmed it contacted law enforcement shortly after the stream was flagged.

The company would not explain what the moderator error involved, or precisely how long it took to remove the stream. It said the broadcast lasted around fifteen minutes – roughly half the thirty minutes some users had speculated online – and that subsequent livestreams by Hilton were terminated within ninety seconds.

But by then, of course, thousands of people had already seen it.

The Miami-Dade County Sheriff’s Office received multiple calls about a man livestreaming acts of self-harm on social media, according to Detective Samantha Choon. A crisis response unit and mental-health professionals were dispatched to Hilton’s home. Authorities later confirmed to CNN that he was alone inside and that deputies spoke with family members before de-escalating the situation. Hilton was taken to hospital.

His family said on Wednesday that he was ‘able to communicate.’ In a statement posted to Hilton’s blog, they thanked supporters for their concern and said that the ordeal had been ‘incredibly difficult and emotional,’ adding that they remained hopeful about his condition.

His manager, Dante Rusciolelli, said that Hilton’s team was not in a position to comment on TikTok’s internal policies or moderation decisions. “Our focus remains entirely on Perez’s health and well-being,” he said.

But the episode has also exposed the peculiar vulnerability of livestreaming platforms. With this kind of immediate access comes a huge risk, with the distance between identifying dangerous content and actually stopping it being measured in seconds.

TikTok has always been clear in its stance against violent content, stating that it prohibits anything that shows, promotes or provides instructions for suicide or self-harm, alongside ‘graphic, violent, or disturbing content.’ The platform uses automated detection and human moderators to enforce these rules, but even with technological intervention human responses can easily be delayed when it comes to instant live broadcasting.

The social media platform has also faced criticism over the years for its failure to adequately moderate content that promotes unhealthy behaviors associated with eating disorders and diet culture.

Livestreaming has repeatedly created a particular challenge for social-media companies because the very qualities that make it compelling, like its immediacy and unpredictability, also make it difficult to police.

In 2020, The Intercept reported on a young Brazilian man who livestreamed his suicide on TikTok. That same year, TikTok struggled to remove graphic clips showing the final moments of Ronnie McNutt, whose suicide on Facebook Live was subsequently circulated widely online.

Credit: @ginaluc25 Instagram

The Hilton livestream followed the same trajectory. Although TikTok eventually removed the broadcast and suspended his account, recordings had already been captured and reposted on X and Instagram. The platform could delete the original but by then it couldn’t erase what viewers had already seen, saved and shared.

Content moderation is often discussed as though the central question is whether a platform can remove something objectionable. Livestreaming introduces a more consequential question: Can it intervene before the moment becomes permanent?

In Hilton’s case, TikTok says it identified the livestream within minutes. Yet a moderator error meant that recognition did not immediately translate into action. The company has not said how many moderators were involved, what the error was, or what safeguards are supposed to prevent the same mistake from happening again.

Hilton built his career by turning other people’s private moments into public spectacle. Beginning his celebrity-gossip blog in 2004, he became one of the defining personalities of the early Internet, later describing himself as the ‘original influencer.’ His career was built around the idea that nothing online stayed private for long.

Despite criticism from many of his former targets, including Ireland Baldwin who shared a controversial post shortly after Hilton’s hospitalisation, calling out his previous behaviour, the blogger is now facing an uncomfortable reversal of the internet permanence that shot him to fame.

For TikTok, the episode is another reminder that moderation is not simply a question of what its systems can detect, but of what happens in the interval between detection and intervention – and who, ultimately, is responsible for closing that gap.

Enjoyed this? Click here for more Gen Z focused tech stories.

Accessibility