AI algorithms are streamlining tasks in nearly every industry, but they’re also helping job-seekers build their CVs. Those same CVs are then screened by AI systems during the recruiting process. What does this mean for the future of the job market?
Artificial Intelligence is not just ‘taking your job,’ it’ll be considering your CV for the next role you apply for. When designated a task during the application process, it’s likely that AI will assess your submitted work and set structure of your final interview.
This may sound unfair – or at the very least lacking in human touch – but most jobseekers aren’t building their applications from scratch any more, either.
A recent survey in France revealed that 3 in 4 people used AI tools during their most recent job search. At least 30 percent of those interviewed used LinkedIn chatbots when looking for a new job.
In the UK, the picture is similar. Nearly 60 percent of young jobseekers said they are using AI tools while job seeking. That’s a major jump from last year, where only 38 percent of UK graduates admitted to using generative AI to help with applications.
With computer-generated communication dominating every level of the recruiting experience, is the job market really just a bunch of AI chatbots speaking to one another?
Facts About Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) Software
1. Most hiring companies use Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) software that scans resumes, cover letters, and other job recruitment documents for relevant keywords.
2. Your resume or cover letter should be created in a way…
Many people would argue that the use of AI means a candidate is lying on their CV or, at the minimum, gaining some competitive advantage over other applicants.
In terms of creating a disadvantage, the first thing that might come to mind would be the fallout for older applicants who may not lack the know-how to access and apply the latest AI technology.
But the survey of 5,300 people in France revealed that nearly 70 per cent of people over the age of 50 used AI tools as part of their job search compared to 83 per cent of people under 25. These figures present a lower discrepancy than many might’ve predicted, and is one that will likely lessen over time.
Still, should an AI-assisted resume be considered fraudulent? Should using AI to help describe your skills and experience in a cover letter be considered ‘cheating’?
The UK-based publication HRnews says an application’s authenticity really depends on how much AI is used. They note that a total copy and paste job is easy to spot, with tools such as OpenAI using broad generalisations that can’t match up to a unique career experience written by an actual human.
When applicants use AI to generate answers to interview questions, complete a test assignment or skills assessment to hide a lack of relevant skills, or to mass-apply to jobs and clog the recruiting pipeline, this may be perceived as cheating behaviour.
That said, more and more people have started using AI as a tool to streamline or improve the presentation of their work. The most common ways AI is used in a legitimate way when individuals are aiming to refine their CV, find relevant job openings, or refine their cover letter.
This not only gives job seekers the opportunity to complete more applications, but to improve their likelihood of being interviewed compared to those who haven’t used AI tools.
Considering this, is using AI the game we’ll be forced to play when looking for new jobs in the future?
A self-perpetuating cycle
Many job applicants are well aware of the fact their CVs and cover letters will be scanned by AI software well before they land in human hands.
According to the career website Resume Builder, around 82 percent of companies use AI tools called Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) which analyse all resumes and cover letters, quickly identifying potential candidates by matching their skills and experience with a list of keywords included in a job description.
This is super helpful for recruiters, especially now that they’re receiving 500 percent more applications on average, a newfound reality they attribute to AI-generated resumes and job search results.
Still, the use of AI during the hiring process doesn’t begin and end at resume scanning.
Around 40 percent of companies employ AI chatbots that communicate the next stages of the interview process with candidates, and a furhter 64 percent use AI to review assessments submitted by applicants.
All of this can be really discouraging to those who want to apply for jobs the old-fashioned way. Why are honest human candidates who dedicate hours of their day to applying being treated like nothing more than an algorithm?
It’s likely the intensive use of AI in the hiring process will cause people to abandon their ‘from scratch’ approach to job applications in order to maintain their competitive edge.
If AI is being used at every stage of the hiring process – by graduates, seasoned professionals, recruiters, and hiring teams alike – then is the AI-assisted job seeking game one we will all need to play eventually?
Deputy Editor & Content Partnership ManagerLondon, UK
I’m Jessica (She/Her). I’m the Deputy Editor & Content Partnership Manager at Thred. Originally from the island of Bermuda, I specialise in writing about ocean health and marine conservation, but you can also find me delving into pop culture, health and wellness, plus sustainability in the beauty and fashion industries. Follow me on Twitter, LinkedIn and drop me some ideas/feedback via email.
Billed as a wearable device to optimise physical performance, the Oakley Meta smart glasses may just be a catalyst for 24-7 surveillance and targeted advertising on an unprecedented level.
Meta loves itself a hefty privacy scandal, and this could be another in the making.
By now you’ve probably seen ads featuring Kylian Mbappe and Patrik Mahomes for the Oakley Meta ‘Performance AI glasses’. Taking a colossal dump on the second-gen...
AI-generated audio pornography and sex podcasts are ranking highly on Spotify and explicit video clips are being easily concealed from safeguards. The platform’s reactive moderation is under fire.
Sex sells, we all know that. But what business does porn have being on the biggest music streaming app?
Technically, sexually explicit content is prohibited on Spotify, but the app has a funny way of enforcing this rule. When porn is flagged by...
Fresh research from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Media Lab suggests that frequent use of ChatGPT to write essays might be linked to cognitive decline.
It turns out that using ChatGPT every day to write essays and perform literary tasks may be having a negative impact on our brains.
New research from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Media Lab involved measuring the electrical activity of three different groups of people.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogcSQ-cFRVM&
All three...
As more of us turn to social media for recommendations, is the joy of a hidden gem at risk of extinction?
I used to have a thing for secrecy, at least when it came to food. I revelled in the smug satisfaction of knowing about a low-lit bar that only opens two days a week, or the ramen place tucked behind a dry cleaners that doesn’t accept card. I believed...
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok