Menu Menu

How is the fashion industry responding to war in Ukraine?

Responses from big fashion labels like Nike and YNAP highlight the strange co-existence of fashion and war in the modern age of digital media. 

Many would say the contents of our social media timelines has become the reflection par excellence of the global situation.

If this is true, then the past week has been a particularly dumbfounding composition; fashion week runways sliced between European war updates, detailed commentary on the state of luxury retailers, and political commentary about the state of Ukraine’s borders.

This co-existence of community-ending violence and the vapidness of popular culture was deftly summed up by makeup artist @namvo: ‘I am washing my face before bed while a country is on fire. It feels dumb to wash my face and dumb not to. It has never been this way and it has always been this way.’

Outpourings of support for Ukraine have emerged in the form of donated goods, housing, and fundraising from across the globe.

But while millions of us still struggle to comprehend the reality of yet another war (for Europeans, another war on their doorstep), the annual goings-on of fashion week have served as both an anchor and a distraction.

Fashion companies and industry professionals have faced backlash for the continuation of these high-profile, exclusive events on Europe’s streets. These are spaces dripping in elitism, wealth, and power – all things that, in times of war especially, leave a bitter taste in one’s mouth.

In response to criticism, those in the fashion world are crafting their own responses to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Nike and YNAP (Yoox Net-a-Porter Group) were the first big names to halt shipping to Russian customers.

On Nike’s Russian-language website, the activewear company stated it ‘cannot guarantee the delivery of goods to customers in Russia’.

A few days ago, high-street giant H&M also halted deliveries to Russian customers. The company had already announced that it was closing its stores in Ukraine for the safety of shoppers and employees.

These administrative decisions come after Vogue Ukraine posted a call to the fashion industry, asking them place embargoes on exporting their goods to Russia.

‘In the wake of unprecedented military aggression from the Russian Federation and the growing humanitarian crisis in Ukraine, Vogue UA urges all international fashion and luxury conglomerates and companies to cease any collaborations on the aggressor’s market effective immediately’.

But these measures are not reflected by fashion brand responses on the ground. For the most part, the frills and flounce of fashion week are continuing, unruffled.

Our Instagram feeds remain peppered with polished models and runway struts. Perhaps this morsel of normality is a welcome reminder that the world is still turning. That even in times of great uncertainty, the markers we use to celebrate the passing of a year are still possible.

The streets outside fashions biggest shows have told a different story, however. Poly Kyrychenko, a Ukrainian fashion blogger, was photographed holding a cardboard sign saying ‘No War in Ukraine’, outside Max Mara’s show in Milan on Thursday.

She recalls the horror of waking up that morning to discover her native home was being invaded by Russian troops.

‘I started to look for the Ukrainian flag at 5am, but I didn’t find it, so I made a sign […] My hands were shaking, tears poured down like hail. This is the only thing that can be done while I’m here.’

Kyrychenko’s statement turned out to be one of many street style protests against the conflict in Ukraine. Bloggers and protesters have been arriving outside shows across Milan and Paris, holding the Ukrainian flag and anti-war placards.

Reclaiming the streets of fashion week is a reflection of protests throughout history, where those on the ground have the power of voice to mobilise those at the top.

The actions of those like Kyrychenko have triggered a response from brands like Armani, whose show was presented in silence as a sign of respect towards Ukraine. Gucci has also announced it will be donating $500,000 to UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency.

And across social media, fashion influencers with significant followings are repurposing their accounts to educate and mobilise audiences. Doina Ciobanu, a Moldovan fashion influencer and sustainability advocate, has provided maps of border crossing points and the details of those hosting Ukrainian refugees in surrounding countries.

These reinventions of fashion platforms are a sign of the times – marking the bizarre yet historically commonplace co-existence of fashion and war. As Kyrychenko told Nylon magazine, ‘Now is definitely not the time for outfits’.

But when the spaces we use to talk about our clothes becomes a crucible for political discussion, it’s a sign of how huge these spaces really are.

What may now seem mundane and irrelevant often has the capacity to reach those who are largely unengaged with the global news cycle.

For this reason alone, it’s important we utilise creative outlets like fashion for good, and never underestimate the power they hold in shaping our lives or changing our futures.

Accessibility