In a recent BBC interview, Bill Gates brushed off allegations that he’s a hypocrite for preaching about the climate crisis while owning at least four private jets which he uses to travel for humanitarian work on a regular basis.
Oh, billionaires. Will they ever really get it?
Even those who look most grounded from the outside appear to be deluded about the way their extraordinary lifestyles have an impact on the planet.
Bill Gates seems to be the latest.
The Microsoft tech guru turned humanitarian and climate activist has been extremely wealthy for decades now. According to Forbes, he is the world’s sixth richest individual, worth $106.7 billion.
Gates has been vocal about the work of his organisations which innovate agricultural systems in areas hardest hit by climate change. He also funds research to prevent the outbreak and spread of serious diseases, amongst other efforts.
But when questioned about the regular use of his numerous private jets in a recent interview with the BBC, Bill Gates appeared to be annoyed that anyone would suggest he’s a major contributor to the climate crisis.
During the lengthy interview, Amol Rajan of the BBC asked, ‘What do you say to the charge that if you are a climate change campaigner, but you also travel around the world in a private jet, you’re a hypocrite?’
Awkward, but someone had to say it. Props to Amol.
Bill Gates became visibly agitated and responded that by ‘funding direct air capture that exceeds [his] family’s carbon footprint’ through the organisation Climateworks and by regularly spending ‘billions of dollars on climate innovation’ he is ‘not part of the problem.’
He continued, ‘Should I stay at home and not come to Kenya and learn about farming and malaria?’
While I can understand wanting to enjoy the comforts of wealth (wouldn’t we take all fly private at least once if offered the chance?), it does seem backwards to claim that chucking money into climate organisations makes up for owning and primarily using four private jets on a regular basis.
This is especially true with the knowledge that a private jet flight emits 4.5 to 14 times more CO2 than a flight by a commercial airliner. It’s also worth noting that a single private flight emits 50 times more than the same trip on a European train line.
Still backing himself completely, Gates continued, ‘Anyway, I’m comfortable with the idea that not only am I not part of the problem by paying for the offsets, but also through the billions that my breakthrough energy group is spending.’
He closed the topic with the bold statement, ‘I’m part of the solution.’
Of course, we’ll have to give Mr Gates his flowers for doing far more for the human race and the planet than most earners in his category.
In 2015, he founded Breakthrough Energy as an umbrella company for his investments in sustainable energy and carbon-cutting technologies. In December of last year, Reuters reported that Gates invested more than $2 billion in other climate-related technological development organisations.
Nice work on paper, but it hasn’t totally allowed him to evade occasional criticism.
At a climate-focused conference held by the billionaire, Greenpeace had accused attendees of ‘ecological hypocrisy’ for boasting about their efforts in mitigating the climate crisis while getting to the event on fossil-fuel-hungry private jets.
Whether doing environmental work can cancel out emissions is just another complicated moral dilemma weaved into the climate crisis.
It’s one that Bill Gates – and many others – will likely have to defend for years to come.
I’m Jessica (She/Her). I’m the Deputy Editor & Content Partnership Manager at Thred. Originally from the island of Bermuda, I specialise in writing about ocean health and marine conservation, but you can also find me delving into pop culture, health and wellness, plus sustainability in the beauty and fashion industries. Follow me on Twitter, LinkedIn and drop me some ideas/feedback via email.
Last week, the South Sudanese government imposed a social media ban in an effort to curb the circulation of violent content related to the ongoing violence against its nationals living in Sudan.
South Sudanese authorities gave a 30-day ban on social media to control ongoing tensions between South Sudan and Sudan’s government.
The social media ban was imposed after footage of South Sudanese nationals were shared on social media platforms being...
The trend of sharing our daily meals invites harmful diet tropes, unhealthy comparisons, and a general disillusionment with food. So why can’t we escape ‘What I Eat in a Day’ videos?
There’s a peculiar flavour to modern voyeurism, and it comes in the form of meal vlogging.
Otherwise known as ‘What I Eat in a Day’ videos, food content has emerged as social media’s answer to an appointment with the nutritionist,...
The contentious bill introduces stricter regulations coupled with controversial statements on the matter by the nation’s Prime Minister, sparking concern about a potential right-wing agenda.
The topic of immigration has always been a point of contention for many. Seen as a cause for pride in previous eras, it has become a cautionary tale in the modern world. Just recently, chaos erupted in France after Prime Minister François Bayrou called out...
A new report by the IFoA warns the global economy could face 50% loss in gross domestic product due to the catastrophic impacts of climate change.
The numbers pertaining to the climate crisis continue to paint a grave picture. And a new report from the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries (IFoA) is no different. The organisation has posed a stark warning: if the catastrophic effects of global warming continue...
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok