Menu Menu
[gtranslate]

Where are all the women on the Times ‘Best-of’ list?

A list of the 25 best non-fiction books of the century has sparked debate after it featured just eight female writers. 

A gender disparity in the Sunday Times list of the 25 best non-fiction books of the century has stirred up a gender debate, after it listed only eight books written by women.

At six men to two women, the gender split points to broader patterns in UK non-fiction, an industry in which male authors still dominate. Non-fiction is often associated with more ‘authoritative’ genres like self-help, popular science (22% of books in this category were published by women in 2022) and philosophy (just 10%) – subjects still shaped by patriarchal perceptions of gender and knowledge.

Across the board, a gender pay gap persists at the UK’s leading science publishers.

The Times list has led to an angered response online, with many women taking the opportunity to share some of their favourite non-fiction books by female writers – particularly those that focus on the gender and authority gaps within science-based literature.

As writer Mary Ann Sieghart pointed out, the group behind the Times list results were predominantly male (6:2), meaning gender bias was baked into the decision making. ‘We already know that women are more likely to read books by men than men are to read books by women,’ said Sieghart. ‘So even a 50:50 ratio of reviewers would probably have skewed the result in men’s favour.’

Sieghart is far from alone in her disappointment. Entrepreneur Lucy McCarraher commented on Sieghart’s post to share her own experience of gender disparity within the non-fiction industry. ‘I went through all this with the Business Book Awards 8 years ago when a 10-woman and 10-man judging panel produced 11 white male winners.’

The numbers may have shifted slightly since then, but the story feels similar. Any progress in the non-fiction industry seems to have been more cosmetic than structural.

It’s not as if the past 25 years have been a barren period for women writing in non-fiction. Yes, certain genres remain dominated by men, but that’s more of a reflection on the publishing industry’s persistent gender disparity than of the number of women writing and researching non-fiction topics.

From genre-defining works on science and politics to sharp cultural criticism and memoir, female authors have not only contributed to the field, they’ve fundamentally reshaped it.

Lists like these are not neutral roundups either. They carry significant weight in shaping the industry and how we understand intellectual authority. The Times is a prominent voice in culture, with the power to tell us whose voices matter, whose ideas matter, and whose works are worthy of preservation.

Whether or not it was intentional, excluding women from an ostensibly comprehensive ‘best-of’ list reinforces the notion that knowledge and expertise have a gender.

That’s particularly pertinent in non-fiction, where categories like history, science and economics, still trade heavily on the idea of the ‘expert voice’. That voice has historically been coded as male.

Women are less likely to be commissioned for ‘serious’ non-fiction, less likely to be reviewed in major publications, and less likely to win prestigious awards. Even when they do publish, their work is often framed as ‘personal’ or ‘accessible’ rather than authoritative.

If male-authored books are more frequently reviewed and celebrated, they are more likely to be read. If they are more widely read, they are more likely to be cited, recommended, and included in future lists. Over time, this creates a canon that is constructed in layers of bias. It’s this same pattern that has shaped all areas of culture throughout history, from art to music and fiction.

If the industry is serious about addressing gender disparity, the solution can’t just stop at diversifying judging panels (though it’s a good start). We need a more fundamental shift in how we define and value knowledge.

That means questioning why certain subjects are still perceived as masculine, and why authority is still so often gendered.

Enjoyed this? Click here for more Gen Z focused culture stories.

Accessibility