Menu Menu
[gtranslate]

Study shows wastewater cocaine is messing up marine life

As crazy as it sounds, it does add another layer to how human consumption has been impacting our planet.

For as long as humans have been on this planet, our environmental impact has become innumerable. What’s worse is that many outcomes of our actions remain unbeknownst to us, pushing us closer to the edge of an irreparable planet.

One such example is drugs, which somehow find themselves in our various waterways. At first thought, you might think that this is only possible through illegal dumping by traffickers and illicit drug producers. However, they only account for a fraction of the drugs found in our waters.

Instead, against our wildest imaginations, the primary source is actually ordinary, everyday human activity. Aside from such illicit drugs, it is also common pharmaceuticals, and even caffeine, that end up in natural waterways. Many of us fail to realise that what our body doesn’t absorb from these drugs we excrete, with their remnants ending up in lakes, streams and oceans.

Sadly, as prevalent as this issue is, less is known about how the presence of such drugs in our waters affects wildlife. This is especially true when it comes to illicit drugs such as cocaine or heroin, because let’s face it; it’s not easy to stimulate such a situation in our natural world in the name of science, right?

Well, as it turns out, it is possible, and a group of researchers from the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Griffith University, and the Max Planck Institute came together and did so. Specifically, they took 2-year-old salmon smolts and split them into three groups. A control group that was not exposed to anything, a group exposed to pure cocaine, and a group exposed to benzoylecgonine (a metabolite of cocaine that ends up in human waste).

Subsequently, with trackers attached to them, the salmon were released into Sweden’s Lake Vättern and studied for eight weeks.

While the method they used is surely unusual, and ethically dubious, the landmark findings that were published early in April reveal an eye-opening reality. For one, the group exposed to benzoylecgonine swam 1.9 times farther per week than the other groups, and scattered over 12km further across the lake. While the group exposed to pure cocaine acted somewhat the same, the effects were much weaker and less consistent.

Here’s the thing: in this study, researchers intentionally exposed salmon to an illicit drug. However, past studies in Rio and the Bahamas had found cocaine present in wild sharks, simply from these animals existing within these regions’ waters.

Put together, these studies highlight two problems.

  1. The presence of drugs, and specifically metabolites, is severely affecting marine ecosystems
  2. Our modern wastewater treatment plants are not well-equipped to filter out these drugs.

Looking at the salmon study, while the researchers note that consuming these fish wouldn’t be a problem, it sure does affect their long-term survival.

For one, young fish rely on a finite energy reserve to grow and survive migration to the ocean. Thus, burning such energy via hyperactive swimming leaves them less energy to grow and survive in the open ocean. Moreover, by wandering almost twice as far into unfamiliar territory, these drugged-up fish have higher chances of encountering predators.

With movement determining how they survive within their ecosystem, the presence of drugs in their body alters their instincts. In turn, this might impact how they interact with other species and the entire food web.

Such a fate is likely to be true for countless other drugs, be it illicit or everyday pharmaceuticals.

Early this year, a group of researchers from the University of Waterloo analysed fish living in Canadian rivers near wastewater treatment plants. Their findings? The presence of fentanyl, methadone, and venlafaxine accumulating inside the tissue of wild freshwater fish.

This study outright highlighted that standard wastewater treatment plants are not able to filter synthetic pharmaceuticals. Now, such a lack of efficiency has direct evidence of affecting the physiology of marine wildlife.

However, upgrading water treatment plants to filter out such drugs isn’t easy, as it requires a lot of energy. And where there is a lot of energy, there are a lot of costs to bear. Keeping this in mind, the team of researchers came up with another proposal. That is, an evidence-based approach with targeted intervention.

Instead of forcing every city to spend hundreds of millions on high-energy advanced filtration, they propose targeted upgrades only at high-risk hotspots where marine life is actually being harmed. Additionally, instead of just testing the water, they proposed testing the tissues of fish to set realistic boundaries on the extent of biological damage.

While it’s not easy to stop drug compounds from reaching treatment plants, we surely can be more vigilant in how such waste is processed before becoming runoff into our waters. In the state our natural environment is in, the least we could do is a targeted intervention rather than simply throwing in the towel.

Two words I didn’t expect to use together this week are cocaine and salmon, yet here we are. Our impact truly knows no bounds.

Enjoyed this? Click here for more Gen Z focused change stories.

Accessibility