Over 90% of streams on Spotify are only generated by a pool of 43,000 artists, making it impossible for millions of others to ever receive fair compensation. Is it time for a change?
Spotify’s CEO Daniel Ek has been hit with criticism in the last week for telling artists that they can no longer afford to record an album ‘once every three to four years’ if they want to stay relevant and continue to grow in popularity.
Considering that Ek is worth over $3 billion, his comments upset both successful and underground artists who’ve routinely voiced concerns over Spotify not adequately paying royalties for streams. Mike Mills from REM tweeted that Daniel should ‘go f*** himself’, for example, while singer-songwriter Nadine Shah described the platform as ‘exploitative’.
To add fuel to the fire, Tim Ingham from The Rolling Stone has run the numbers and found that Spotify’s recent earning reports prove it can never pay all of its creators and artists fairly. 90% of streams on the platform are from a relatively small group of artists – around 43,000 – meaning that 90% of the money generated on Spotify only goes to these people. The other millions of musicians who rely on Spotify cannot make anywhere near enough cash from their work alone, ultimately leaving its business model unsustainable for creators.
It’s indicative of Spotify’s business-first approach that views music solely as a commercial product rather than personal, artful expression. Imagine Spotify is a giant factory and each album is running through a conveyor belt, scrambling to gain relevance in a sea of choice that while very pro-consumer, leaves artists reliant on Spotify’s algorithms.
The issue of fair pay has been a hot topic surrounding streaming platforms ever since they were launched in the late noughties. Spotify competitors such as Deezer and TIDAL have actually used their marginally higher artist pay outs as marketable assets in the past, implying that by signing up for their services you’re an ethically superior consumer. The reality though is that the majority of artists currently earn very little for streams, even if they’re racking up tens of thousands of plays. Musician Joanna Newsom spoke about the flaws of this business model with Larry King in 2015, describing it as a ‘cynical, musician-hating system’.
Merchandise and touring has become the backbone of profitability and now that coronavirus has made the former impossible, it’s very hard for anyone who isn’t a high end celebrity to earn cash.
Spotify’s current pay-out system, which sends money directly to labels to then redistribute as it sees fit, is flawed. To meaningfully increase revenue for artists it would need to create an extremely large pool of money that it doesn’t have, or rethink where it sends royalty payments. This means the company will likely never reach its goal of 1 million artists making a sustainable living solely through streams.
Many artists clearly feel the same way, too. Petitions have popped up online demanding a triple pay increase for artists and Ben Beaumont-Thomas from The Guardian criticised Spotify’s newly introduced ‘tip jar’ feature as a superficial solution to a wider industry problem. The bottom line is that Spotify needs to pay more money to artists and it should rethink its business model, even if it means we have to pay a little extra each month for our subscription.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEQFRjQJS9o
Streaming is a fantastic service as a consumer, but it lowers the value of a single track or album and makes it harder for everyday listeners to financially support bands they love. CEO Daniel Ek and his comments regarding musical productivity suggest the company still has a ways to go in showing compassion toward the artists that made it such an industry titan, and it’d do well to remember that music isn’t just a vehicle for profits.
Until Spotify significantly rethinks how its royalties are distributed, artists will have to continue relying on other means of revenue to make a living. Perhaps Daniel could chuck a few of those billions back our way?
I’m Charlie (He/Him), a Senior Remote Writer at Thred. I was previously the Editor at Thred before moving to Bristol in 2024. As a music and gaming enthusiast, I’m a nerd for pop culture. You can find me curating playlists, designing article headline images, and sipping cider on a Thursday. Follow me on LinkedIn and drop me some ideas/feedback via email.
With Glastonbury about to kick off – and dozens of other major event on the agenda for this summer – festival organisers across the UK have made crowd control measures their top priority.
Festival season has arrived. It brings a series of some of the most exciting musical lineups and fun-filled weekends of the summer, and with it, hundreds of thousands of people who flock to once-empty fields to dance,...
The singer and musician has received flack for her upcoming album artwork. Titled ‘Man’s Best Friend,’ the image shows her hair being pulled while she kneels on the ground.
Sabrina Carpenter is set to release her new album ‘Man’s Best Friend’ on August 29th 2025.
As part of her promotional rollout, she has shared the cover artwork on Instagram this week. It shows Sabrina on the floor, on her knees,...
Where do we draw the line when it comes to normalising plastic surgery?
I’ll be the first to admit that – when it comes to discussions of beauty treatments, tweakments, and under-the-knife surgery – I’m usually one to jump on the empowerment soap box.
‘You do you!’, ‘It’s your body’, ‘who cares what other people think?’. I’ve thrown these lines out on more than one occasion – whether it’s coaching a friend through...
With the advent of diet drugs like Ozempic, plus size stars are increasingly losing weight – and gaining haters.
To see a plus-size woman on a red carpet was, for a time, rather revolutionary. I hesitate to use that word for fear it sounds gouache and trite, but I'll admit it rings true. Sadly.
Any body that wasn’t slim signalled that a long-standing aesthetic order was being, if not dismantled, at...
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok
1 Comment
