Menu Menu
[gtranslate]

Is ‘mankeeping’ a common dynamic straining straight relationships?

Researchers have finally named the phenomenon experienced by heterosexual women who’ve been told at least once in their lives, ‘You’re not his therapist.’

Angelica Ferrara and Dylan Vergara from Stanford University published an article on ‘mankeeping,’ which theorizes heterosexual men’s growing dependency on their partners for their emotional needs.

According to Theorizing Mankeeping: The Male Friendship Recession and Women’s Associated Labor as Structural Component of Gender Inequality research, ‘the burden of patriarchy’ on heterosexual men often manifests as difficulty expressing emotions and forming meaningful friendships.

Because patriarchy tends to frame vulnerability or negative emotions as weakness, many men are discouraged from building emotional intimacy with one another. Ferrara and Vergara argue that the shrinking of men’s social networks contributes to a growing epidemic of male loneliness, leaving the women in their lives to become the only ‘support system’.

While ‘mankeeping’ takes its name from a 1985 theory – ‘kinkeeping’ – that discusses women’s invisible labor in holding extended families together, like organizing dinners, this new perspective points to another role women often perform unknowingly: emotional labor. Or, as the TikTokers love to say, ‘a free therapist.’

The article suggests three types of mankeeping: women acting as their partner’s social network manager, reminding them to call their friends, serving as emotional outsourcing centers, or taking on the role of emotional educators – teaching men how to identify and name their feelings.

Pete Davidson’s 2021 SNL sketch, in which girlfriends and wives take their partners to a man park to find them a friend, might be considered a preliminary version of what this article is exploring now.

Even though these acts may sound like a typical exchange in a relationship where partners support each other, the article repeatedly highlights that the dynamic they examine is one-sided, leaving women emotionally exhausted as they give support without receiving any in return.

As some women have started to share their own experiences and how they have just realized they were mankeeping during their relationships, the criticism has begun as well.

Benjy Kusi, an inclusion and well-being consultant, reacted to the theory as another way of labeling men and decentering the issue, arguing that it focuses on women’s burden as a support system rather than addressing men at the center of mental health crises.

Similarly, in The Will to Change, bell hooks criticizes some feminist theory  centering women’s need for safe spaces while often overlooking that men also need space and support to change.

Yet, throughout the article, Ferrara and Vergara emphasize the importance of men finding support outside their romantic relationships. They highlight the damage the patriarchy causes to everyone and offer possible suggestions for creating healthier dynamics in their lives.

Although Kusi’s criticism doesn’t quite align with the researcher’s intentions, it raises an important point outside the article: we need to find alternative ways to discuss complex issues without creating a hierarchy between the subjects.

Accessibility