Samples taken from 100 men in Denmark reveal the presence of a ‘cocktail’ of toxic chemicals, causing scientists to question how these chemicals are affecting our ability to reproduce.
While a large portion of Gen-Z isn’t exactly rushing to populate the Earth (duh, it’s burning!), there’s been concern in recent years that declining sperm counts in men could lead to population problems in the future.
Research from the early 90s detected a 50 percent decline in global sperm counts globally when compared to the 1970s. In a study conducted two decades later, that number had shot up closer to 60 percent.
Today, nearly 1 in 8 American couples struggle with infertility, but pinpointing the cause of male infertility is not an easy task for reproductive specialists. Genetic diseases, hormonal imbalances, and other factors – stress, obesity, smoking, drug use, and sedentary lifestyles – can all play a part.
But what about the things we can’t always avoid, like the ‘forever chemicals’ embedded in fast food wrappers or added into cosmetic products? What impact are these having on our ability to have a future mini-me?
A recent study on Danish men aged 18 to 30 years old discovered ‘alarming’ quantities of bisphenol, phthalates, and dioxins in their urine samples. The levels of these chemicals in the body were reported 100x higher than considered safe.
Phthalates (for example, BPA & BPS) are used in everyday plastics and can be used to make coatings for heat, water, and stain resistant products. They will never naturally break down, instead accumulating in humans and our environments over time.
These plastic chemicals are known to mimic hormones such as oestrogen, interfering with human pathways to inhibit the effects of testosterone – ultimately messing with the reproductive capabilities of men and young adults, too.
Experts say that while headlines claiming the human race will die out due to declining sperm count are overdramatic and unfounded, evidence that phthalates, pesticides, heavy metals, toxic gases, and other synthetic materials are hindering human fertility is growing.
Understanding the effects of these chemicals has seen studies focus more on sperm motility (the amount of healthy, swimming sperm) over traditional research’s fixation with sperm count, which – at face value – doesn’t paint a clear picture of whether the sperm present is healthy, mutated, or immobile.
And while more research is needed, especially in the field of women’s reproductive health, studies can ascertain that ‘forever chemicals’ aren’t good for our bodies – and one would be wise to believe this doesn’t omit reproductive systems.
The bad news is, reducing our exposure to these chemicals won’t be easy as they are found in almost everything we use daily.
That said, it may be reassuring to know that the EU has pretty strict regulations for the use of phthalates. In fact, 40 percent of all product recalls in the year 2018 occurred as a result of their inclusion.
Across the pond in the US, regulations aren’t as strict – but the Consumer Product Safety Commission did ban the use of eight ortho-phthalates in children’s toys and child-care items in 2017.
Fast food restaurants are striving to abandon toxicity, with Burger King pledging to remove forever chemicals from its packaging by 2025. But medical scientists continue to strongly encourage cooking at home as often as possible to reduce chemical exposure.
Deputy Editor & Content Partnership ManagerLondon, UK
I’m Jessica (She/Her). I’m the Deputy Editor & Content Partnership Manager at Thred. Originally from the island of Bermuda, I specialise in writing about ocean health and marine conservation, but you can also find me delving into pop culture, health and wellness, plus sustainability in the beauty and fashion industries. Follow me on Twitter, LinkedIn and drop me some ideas/feedback via email.
Through fear of being plastered with the label ‘greenwasher,’ companies are withholding details of their climate targets, progress, and even sustainable milestones. This burgeoning issue is being called ‘greenhushing.’
Exposing companies for greenwashing tactics is supposed to bring about increased transparency, but for some, the mere possibility of being tarred with this brush is enough to avoid all communication on anything related to sustainability.
We’ve seen countless times in recent years how baseless green claims can...
There’s a stark contrast in the way we respond to female versus male sporting victory. It’s time we asked ourselves why.
When England’s Lionesses clinched a historic back-to-back UEFA Women’s Euro title with their 2-1 victory over Spain on Sunday, celebrations erupted across the country.
Fans flocked to Trafalgar Square, brands rushed to post congratulatory graphics, and news channels cleared their schedules to show the game live on not one, but...
Falling birthrates are reshaping the modern world. But the loudest voices framing it as a crisis reveal deeper anxieties about power, tradition, and who gets to inherit the future.
It has become a familiar refrain: people aren’t having babies, and the world as we know it is on the brink. In the UK, the fertility rate dropped to 1.49 children per woman in 2022, from 1.55 in 2021. Besides the...
Women’s football is not just changing the commercial landscape of sport. It’s redefining what football looks and feels like, from the pitch to the culture that surrounds it.
For over a century, football has been dominated by the aesthetics of aggression: chest-pounding celebrations, tunnel brawls, and tabloid-fuelled egos.
This cultural mythology – historically shaped by the men’s game – has leaned heavily on narratives of dominance, tribalism, and stoicism. But the...
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.
0 Comments
