Menu Menu
[gtranslate]

Will carbon markets help Africa or is the whole thing a myth?

Companies in the Global North are increasingly purchasing carbon credits to offset their emissions, while projects across Africa are encouraging farmers to adopt climate friendly practices that can generate those credits.

The process is theoretically simple. Farmers plant trees or adopt other practices that help to sequester carbon dioxide directly from the atmosphere. This is then measured and sold to companies as credits to help them offset their own impact on the environment.

But the important question remains: can the markets truly help African farmers?

Climate change is already having a serious impact on the lives of many smallholder farmers on the continent. Heavy rainfall, droughts, and poor soil quality are threatening the food security of many.

Practices like agroforestry, cover cropping, and reduced tillage can help farmers adapt to the changing climate and sequester a great deal of carbon. Carbon markets promise to reward these practices financially.

Farmers are already being enrolled in carbon credit programs through projects in Kenya, Tanzania, and Ghana. They are being trained in climate friendly farming practices, in some instances, being compensated for carbon stored in their land.

Those in support of these initiatives contend that once the programs become established, they will provide new sources of income for rural areas that have been previously excluded from global climate financing.

Although Africa has produced only a small fraction of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions, the agricultural producers on the continent experience some of the worst consequences of today’s changing climate. Advocates of these carbon markets believe that they will also help to level the playing field among agricultural producers.

Critics argue that they are not as straightforward as many believe, however. The main argument has to do with transparency. The methods developed for measuring and verifying how much carbon is being stored in many cases are arbitrary, complicated, and difficult for smallholder farmers to understand.

Most of the smallholder farmers who are being enrolled in carbon credit programs already have limited access to financial services and digital technology, so they have a difficult time understanding how their contributions result in carbon credits and ultimately, payment.

In addition to transparency issues, many smallholder farmers do not understand how the revenues produced from carbon credits are being divided between project developers, brokers, and certification bodies.

Even though carbon credits may be sold for significant amounts on international markets, farmers typically receive very little of that revenue compared to project developers, brokers, and certification bodies, who each take a share of the revenue prior to any labour payments.

Despite these concerns, interest in African carbon projects is rising. Governments and international bodies believe that carbon markets hold much promise for channeling climate finance into rural Africa. Africa is said to have 60% of the world’s available land for farming and is considered to have huge potential for nature-based climate solutions. As such, Africa is considered a frontier for carbon credit production.

For the farmer, there is more at stake than just receiving money. There is the potential for gaining more from training on sustainable farming methods. This could mean more resilient crops and less dependence on costly chemicals – helping to mitigate food security.

In terms of contracts, farmers require more honesty with greater visibility of carbon pricing and larger shares of revenue generated from farming their land, according to experts. To keep rural communities in charge of how their carbon resources are used, additional local cooperatives or community-led projects could play an increased role.

While carbon markets are not necessarily a magic solution to Africa’s agricultural problems, if they are designed to be fair, then they provide farmers with means to adjust to climate change while allowing them to participate in a global climate marketplace that has ignored them for many years.

The ultimate outcome remains to be seen, as there is a question of whether or not these systems focus on those working the land versus simply creating a new marketplace and allowing most of the profits to go to others.

Enjoyed this? Click here to read more Gen Z focused change stories.

Accessibility