Last year, ocean conservationists grew worried as nations failed to sign the High Seas Treaty for the fifth time. But over the weekend, the UN achieved momentous success – it received signatures from leaders of 193 countries to protect one of the planet’s largest and most precious resources.
It’s the day many were starting to believe would never come.
After more than two decades of negotiating, the UN has finally reached a deal with world leaders to protect the high seas from a history of lawlessness and exploitation.
Late on Saturday evening in New York, the UN conferences’ president Rena Lee announced that a legally binding agreement to protect the high seas had been reached after five rounds of negotiations.
‘The ship has reached the shore,’ she declared proudly.
The historic treaty will be essential to achieve pledges written in the 30×30 pledge, which strives to protect one third of all sea and one third of all land on Earth by 2030.
The ‘high seas’ refers to any ocean mass labelled as international waters.
Until now, the high seas have not been subject to any rules or regulations set by national governments, as they technically do not belong to anyone or any nation.
That said, the high seas are incredibly massive. They make up nearly half of the earth’s surface and account for 60 percent of its total ocean mass.
Oceans are also one of our most vital carbon sinks. They produce half of the oxygen we breathe while absorbing 20 percent of global carbon dioxide emissions annually. On top of all this, they capture 90 percent of the heat produced by greenhouse gases.
It’s clear to see how these colossal ocean ecosystems play a significant role in keeping our planetary ecosystem in balance. The UN has branded oceans as the ‘world’s greatest ally against climate change,’ so it’s only right that we enforce measures to protect them.
Negotiations have become further complicated in recent years, as the subject of how to appropriately achieve climate justice has taken centre stage.
As new discoveries are made about the ocean, discussions have overlapped with sensitive political issues, in particular, how to fairly allocate ocean resources between developed and developing nations.
This has been a key motivation for creating the treaty in the first place, as just five countries have managed to scoop up the lion’s share of fish populations from the high seas due to their geographic advantage and access to large fishing boats.
Although conservationists have heralded the signing of the treaty, they warn that there are some areas that need improvement.
For example, certain loopholes could be identified, as countries agreed that existing bodies currently responsible for regulating activities such as fisheries, shipping and deep-sea mining could continue to do so.
At the moment, this part of the treaty enables them to avoid carrying out environmental impact assessments laid out in the texts.
There was also a disagreement between developing and developed nations on how to fairly share marine genetic resources (MGR) and any profits that come from them.
MGR is the genetic material of deep-sea marine sponges, krill, corals, seaweeds, and bacteria. These genetic materials have attracted the attention of both medical and cosmetic companies, which seek to use MGR’s regenerative properties in their products.
No doubt, there will be follow-up meetings on how to properly allocate these resources. It’s likely that the Global North and Global South will have different opinions, which was a key reason the treaty has taken so long to be signed in the first place.
The treaty outlines three additional focuses.
These include area-based management tools, environmental impact assessments, and the transfer of marine technology and building of capacity.
Thanks to the treaty, new restrictions will be placed on the amount of fishing allowed to take place within the high seas. It also addresses marine-based activities such as deep seabed mining, as well as deep sea carbon capture and storage.
It also addresses the safeguarding of marine animals, as well as communities that rely economically on fishing and marine tourism. Until now, efforts to protect marine species such as dolphins, whales, and communities that interact with them have been governed by a muddled collection of legal restrictions.
With the new treaty, there are clear rules that protect both marine and human life in these areas – a huge step forward for ocean conservation and policy which allows us to live in harmony with nature.
The real work is just beginning
With agreements now in place, the journey begins to reach the 30×30 target in only seven years.
The environmental organisation Greenpeace has reported that 11 million sq km of the ocean will have to be put under protection each year until 2030 in order to do so.
With careful and proper implementation, the High Seas Treaty should prevent the collapse of the undersea ecosystem, restore the balance of fish supplies globally, and help to mitigate climate change.
Laura Meller, who campaigns for oceans through Greenpeace said, ‘Countries must formally adopt the treaty and ratify it as quickly as possible to bring it into force, and then deliver the fully protected ocean sanctuaries our planet needs.’
With the High Seas Treaty finally signed, let’s hope we see action implemented immediately. Our most valuable climate ally depends on it.
I’m Jessica (She/Her). Originally from Bermuda, I moved to London to get a Master’s degree in Media & Communications and now write for Thred to spread the word about positive social change, specifically ocean health and marine conservation. You can also find me dipping my toes into other subjects like pop culture, health, wellness, style, and beauty. Follow me on Twitter, LinkedIn and drop me some ideas/feedback via email.
Toxic forever chemicals, which never break down in the natural environment or the human body, have been found in drinking water supplies in England.
Although we typically stray from doomsday-type news on Fridays, the fact that England’s drinking water is confirmed to contain toxic forever chemicals is the kind of information we have to share.
A recent report from the UK’s Drinking Water Inspectorate (DWI) has found that hundreds of drinking...
When it comes to the insidious techniques that the industry is using to greenwash its image, undermine climate negotiations, and delay progress, there are many. Here, we break down astroturfing and corporate personhood, highlighting how they relate to this year’s COP28 summit.
‘What’s the point of our climate summits if they’re being undermined by a shadow network of fossil fuel lobbying?’
This question, asked by a campaigner to...
A leading voice in racial justice and digital organising, Chelsea Miller is the co-founder of Freedom March NYC, one of the largest youth-led civil rights groups in America. We spoke to her about how considering long-term impact should always take precedence over promoting band-aid solutions.
‘People can’t be what they don’t see,’ says Chelsea Miller, who is amongst Gen Z’s most prominent social change leaders. Embodying this...
Low calorie, low sugar, and gluten-free labels on pre-mixed alcoholic beverages are attempts to lure health-conscious young people into drinking, a research team in Australia says after analysing the labels of 491 different beverages.
If your health is declining, the first thing you’ll likely be told to do is to eat and drink healthier.
Alcohol, in that case, will likely be off the table as the overwhelming scientific consensus is...