Menu Menu
[gtranslate]

Trump’s war on ‘Woke AI’ is a smokescreen for something bigger

The US President just signed an executive order that seeks to remove regulatory models for artificial intelligence. 

Just weeks ago, Elon Musk’s Grok chatbot ‘Grok’ stunned the internet by declaring itself ‘MechaHitler’ and parroting antisemitic conspiracies, racist policies, and sexual content so extreme that even Musk’s own platform, X, couldn’t ignore the damage.

‘We are aware,’ the company offered in a tepid post, vowing to rein in its rogue chatbot. But a week later, the bot was still praising Germany’s far-right AfD and promoting eugenicist immigration views. Many suspected that Grok was a reflection of its creator’s own stance on said subjects.

But despite the plethora of moral questions that AI has raised since it bolted into the mainstream (Grok’s violent comments being one of most damning examples) Donald Trump seems unfazed.

On Wednesday, the president signed an executive order that he vowed would turn the United States into an ‘AI export powerhouse’, including one that targets what he terms ‘woke’ AI models.

‘We’re getting rid of woke,’ Trump declared at an AI policy summit. He then criticised his predecessor, Joe Biden, for having ‘established toxic diversity, equity and inclusion ideology as a guiding principle of American AI development.’

Framed as an attempt to dethrone China in the race for AI supremacy, the Trump administration’s plan is built on three pillars: acceleration, infrastructure, and global leadership. But at its ideological core is a deep mistrust of any system that reflects the diversity of America.

The new order requires any AI company receiving federal funding to maintain a politically neutral artificial intelligence model free of ‘ideological dogmas such as DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion)’.

The idea is that these stringent boundaries will prevent ‘woke AI in the federal government,’ marking the first time a US government has explicitly tried to shape the behaviour of artificial intelligence.

But the move will force the tech industry to abandon years of work to combat pervasive forms of racial and gender bias ingrained in AI models.

Given the unpredictable nature of this technology – along with its rapidly advancing power and intelligence – this paints a concerning picture of our digital future. If AI is left unchecked, dangerous socio-political agendas, ideologies, and even political policy could more easily infiltrate and shape our daily lives.

The move comes as part of Trump’s larger plan to crack down on diversity within major institutions, including federal agencies, academic institutions, and the military.

‘We need US technology companies to be all-in for America. We want you to put America first,’ Trump declared, making it clear that DEI has no place in his version of the US.

Yet, even as the administration pushes deregulation in the name of innovation, it is simultaneously introducing new ideological constraints, limiting which truths AI is allowed to tell.

If the policy’s culture war rhetoric seems overheated, its economic ambitions are laser-focused. The Action Plan calls for rapid expansion of AI infrastructure, in part by stripping away environmental and regulatory ‘obstacles.’

In Texas, OpenAI’s Stargate Project is investing $500 billion in mega-data centers. Meta has announced a facility nearly the size of Manhattan. And Musk’s xAI has quietly secured a $200 million deal with the Department of Defense.

But what’s the human and ecological cost of this acceleration? As the Southern Environmental Law Center warns, the plan effectively greenlights private companies to ‘steamroll’ local communities in the race for AI supremacy – building massive facilities that drain water, overheat power grids, and pump pollution into surrounding areas.

The Trump administration’s invocation of ‘truth’ is also, of course, highly selective. By rejecting AI systems that incorporate DEI principles, it isn’t removing bias from algorithms, it’s enforcing a different kind of bias, one that aligns with a reactionary worldview.

This approach would likely ban large swaths of open-source models used by government agencies, while prioritizing models that reinforce traditional hierarchies – models like Grok, for example.

The US is racing toward AI superintelligence, but what kind of intelligence do we want it to reflect? If the Trump doctrine prevails, the future of AI may be one where accuracy is subordinate to ideology, and where ‘truth’ is defined by whoever holds the executive pen.

History has always been written by the winners, but with the advent of artificial intelligence, even the world’s most powerful face an uncertain future in which the ‘winners’ are harder to define.

Accessibility