The highly anticipated fashion collab claims to be ‘disrupting the industry’, but the use of harmful synthetics suggests this ‘disruption’ is more damaging than innovating.
When Nike and Kim Kardashian announced their joint brand, NikeSKIMS, the press release was polished to perfection. The companies called it ‘an incredible opportunity to disrupt the industry with our shared passion and commitment to innovation.’
But when the first collections dropped this Friday, disruption came in the form of polyester leggings and nylon sports bras. In other words, more fossil fuel fashion for a world already drowning in it.
The collaboration has already sparked backlash from unlikely sources. In an Instagram story, actor and outspoken climate activist Nathalie Kelley shared a post outlining the new collection’s use of harmful synthetics.
‘In practice [NikeSKIMS] seems to translate into producing more fossil fuel-based fashion, with little regard for people and planet’ the post stated. It’s hard to disagree. Nike’s track record of sweatshop conditions and labour rights violations, combined with Skims’ own 2022 allegations of worker exploitation in Myanmar, doesn’t exactly scream empowerment.
‘Both Nike’s and Kim Kardashian’s stocks are down so in a shrewd attempt to stay relevant, they’ve decided to collaborate on NikeSKIMS, ready to sculpt our saggy rumps this spring. It reeks of desperation, and it’s a match made in fossil fuel hell,’ writes Venetia La Manna.
Introducing NikeSKIMS.
Designed to sculpt. Engineered to perform. A new brand for those who refuse to compromise. pic.twitter.com/Dv85GaU8eS
— Nike (@Nike) September 22, 2025
The launch campaign has established itself with the message of women’s strength, power, and innovation – placing prominent sportswomen like Serena Williams front and center. But it’s a message of hypocrisy. Apparently, the strength and power of the women sewing the garments themselves aren’t as high a priority.
What makes NikeSKIMS particularly fascinating is that it highlights a widespread misconception about fast fashion. The term has long been shorthand for ultra-cheap retailers like Shein, Boohoo, or Primark. But fast fashion is less about price and more about pace, scale, and material impact.
Skims may market itself as a ‘premium basics’ line, and Nike may position its products as ‘performance innovation,’ but both are guilty of the same churn – with constant new drops, synthetic-heavy fabrics, opaque supply chains, and enormous marketing machines.
Skims, in fact, scored zero in Remake’s 2024 Fashion Accountability Report—performing worse than even Shein or Boohoo when it comes to transparency. Nike, meanwhile, cut 30% of its sustainability team last year, signalling that climate priorities were expendable when times got tough.




