Menu Menu
[gtranslate]

Opinion – Japan’s ‘carnivorous women’ talk is oppressive

In Japan, ‘carnivorous women’ and ‘herbivorous men’ are less to do with what’s on people’s plates, and more about what the different genders can bring to the table. Is this a reclamation of women’s right to consume in a free market, or is it yet another iteration of patriarchal capitalism?

You may have already heard about the online Women’s Carnivore Tribe. Maybe you’re partial to a steak or 2 yourself, maybe you’re passionate about protein, or perhaps you too don’t want to waste any more time on regular bowel movements.

If you’ve not yet had the pleasure, it’s an online community for meat-eating women to share recipes, advice, and anecdotes.

While the idea may seem a little intense for some people, the theoretical basis is simple enough: women ought to have the same access to alimentary resources, and a space to talk about it, as men. On paper, a woman’s consumption habits and her love life don’t seem to have too much in common.

That is, until you find yourself on the East Asian side of the internet. In Japan, to be a ‘carnivorous woman’ has wholly different connotations, and has nothing to do with what women have on their plate.

Credit: Julia Yus

The East Asian response to the western world’s ‘Girl Boss’ stereotype, carnivorous women in Japan give ‘bringing home the bacon’ a wholly different connotation. These women supposedly prioritise work and money over motherhood and relationships.

They are labelled ‘carnivorous’ due to a perception that these women ‘devour men’ (figuratively). Not in the  ‘She Ate’ house down boots kind of way, but more in a ‘she eats men up and spits them out’ kind of thing.

Straight off the bat, this has obvious and alarming connotations for the perception of binary gender roles within heterosexual relationships. The idea that one must be the consumer whilst the other is consumed fosters a rhetoric of domination and subjugation within modern-day relationships.

Whilst historically this has often placed the man above the woman, the idea of consumable men, known as ‘herbivorous men’ in Japanese culture, flips the script. What this new narrative doesn’t consider, however, is the possibility that both participants could be both and neither, and that this distinction may be more arbitrary than mutually exclusive.

According to Maki Fukasawa, a ‘herbivorous man’ is one who is ‘gentle, quiet, and soft’. He typically does not have traditional ‘manly’ characteristics such as aggressiveness and sexual dominance. Instead, he treats women not as sex objects but as friends. He does not care whether he has a girlfriend or not, and he likes the same things women like, such as cooking and eating cake. If you can imagine such horror!

One of the most popular iterations of this figure is Tsuyoshi Kusanagi, a member of the popular group SMAP, before they disbanded in 2016. Kusanagi became a feminine icon at the same time that British bands like the Rolling Stones were positioning themselves as firm iterations of masculinity through rock music, a male-dominated genre of music.

As a result, Japan’s carnivorous women are cast, of course, as the predatory antithesis to Japan’s response to the ‘soy boy’.

According to an article in Japan Today, which essentially gamifies Japanese men based on their proximity to women, Carnivorous Men (Nikushoku Danshi) are those who actively seduce women thanks to their strength and reliability. By contrast, herbivorous men tend to be ‘shy about relationships’.

Rather than pursuing a prospective girlfriend, they do genuinely believe men and women can be friends without an ulterior motive. Of the 400 single men around 30 years old who were surveyed in Japan, 3 quarters are believed to be ‘Soshoku Danshi’.

There are even Pescatarians (Gyoshoku Danshi), which can be further subdivided into categories such as the ‘teriyaki’, ‘boiled fish’, and even the ‘Meuniere’ type depending on how patient, outgoing, or narcissistic they are.

These men tend to wait for women to fall in love with them before pursuing any attraction. Rolled Cabbage Men (Rolled Cabbage Danshi) are more low-key but can turn into Nikushoku Danshi when on a date with a woman, whilst Creamy Fanshi have a soft sweet exterior with an apparently uber masculine priority. And the list goes on.

While masculinity, especially within the manosphere, seems intent on defining men’s ‘masculinity’ in relation to their ability to dominate or subjugate women, the carnivorous women stereotype sees women entering the worst kind of male spaces.

While they’ve graduated from girlhood to womanhood through their internet personality categorisation, this has only led to their further subjugation, in the same way that men are categorised in relation to other men.

The difference? Men have been (figuratively) consuming women for centuries, from greater economic freedoms they’ve been granted, to less domestic responsibility. They have less mental and physical consequences during the course of making a family, and much less at stake in society if they remain single.

Men’s spouses are not, as has been the case for women, their only source of income.

In this sense we may say the ‘kept’ woman is akin to the ‘consumed’ one, since heterosexual relationships have historically been presented as women’s only option for centuries.

Whereas for men, to be herbivorous, whilst highlighting the gender pressures that patriarchal society has burdened men with too, is not seen as their default in the same way that it is for women.

To be weak as a man is abnormal, fetishised maybe, especially by female Japanese manga writers who created series such as The Pink Boy and Mizutama Honey Boy. Nevertheless, while a certain degree of effeminacy may lose them some clout, economically and socially men still have a lot more opportunities than women.

Whereas for carnivorous women, like those who form part of the carnivorous women tribe, they are seen as deviating from the norm. This is the idea that as a woman you should want to have babies, to have sex with men and to live a slower pace of life in order to accommodate men’s desire for you.

And people wonder why it’s considered embarrassing to have a boyfriend now.

Historically, vegetarianism has been conflated with femininity. This is, in large part, due to British misconceptions of the Hindu vegetarian diet as British colonisers sought to justify their rule over other people by suggesting that it was the diet, rather than British colonial ideology, which made Indian people subject to subjugation.

In this sense, herbivorous men’s indifference to romantic relationships is code for a disinterest in domination. In other words, if you’re not subjugating you must be subjugatable, and therefore you must be weak.

This means that, in turn, like the alpha male in a pack of lions, carnivorous women are not just strong, but in being so they must also be masculine.

This seems like a return to 2nd wave feminism, when gender equality had extended little beyond women fighting for the right to be exploited at the same rate that men were by someone else who owns the means of capital. In this case, the veganism to carnivore pipeline emulates that of housewife to girl boss, with neither being necessarily a healthy way to characterise the complexities of interpersonal relationship dynamics.

To enter into a relationship under the impression that you will either be consumed or devoured is to impose the same capitalistic sense of competition that plagues modern-day society into one of the more intimate parts of your life.

To have your gender and personality defined by the way that you relate to a romantic, sexual partner is at once the very epitome of ‘the personal is political’. Yet, it is simultaneously so ludicrously close-minded that there appears to be no room for people to just treat each other as equals, or indeed to accept that within a lasting relationship, surely these dynamics are likely to be changeable.

Whether we’re talking about actually carnivorous women, anecdotally adamant on the advantages of a meat-rich diet, or Japanese women who dare to prioritise something other than a relationship, the answer to the question seems obvious.

Is consumption an inherently masculine activity? Absolutely.

Have men historically been more entitled to consume whilst women have been vilified for daring to desire? Absolutely.

Will advocating for women to be able to eat a load of meat when their real craving is not what’s on their plate, but a smaller number on the scales, help to emancipate women in this rhetoric of patriarchal entitlement?

Why don’t you go put on a suit, eat a steak, and find out.

Enjoyed this article? Click here to read more Gen Z focused change stories.

Accessibility