Menu Menu
[gtranslate]

New study suggests diet changes could aid endometriosis pain

The report marks a turning point for sufferers of the disease – one which, despite growing awareness, remains grossly under researched. 

Turns out – if you’re one of the estimated 1 in 10 women globally living with endometriosis – there might be something revolutionary about your plate of food. A landmark new study has found that eliminating gluten, dairy, coffee and alcohol can significantly reduce the painful symptoms of the chronic (often debilitating) condition.

On Instagram, posts about anti-inflammatory smoothies and gluten-free meal preps aren’t just wellness fluff. Women suffering from endometriosis are now adding them to a growing arsenal of treatments for their condition. Needless to say, the disease is still being largely neglected by science.

The new study represents a potential shift in how endometriosis is approached, both medically and socially. It’s the largest international survey ever conducted on diet and endometriosis, involving 2,599 people. 45% of those individuals reported improved pain when they stopped eating gluten, and another 45% had the same experience after cutting out dairy.

When the women cut down on coffee and other caffeine sources, 43% reported reduced pain, while 53% said the same when cutting back on alcohol.

‘It really feels like we are on the cusp of something pretty big with understanding how diet affects endometriosis symptoms,’ said Philippa Saunders, senior author of the study and professor of reproductive steroids at the University of Edinburgh.

‘It’s so important for women if they feel they can do something for themselves to tackle the pain of endometriosis – that is tremendously empowering.’

Despite its prevalence, endometriosis remains shrouded in mystery. It takes, on average, a staggering eight years to receive a diagnosis in the UK. That’s almost a decade of chronic pelvic pain, fatigue, nausea, and often infertility. On top of the physical symptoms, sufferers often face dismissal by doctors. This medical gaslighting reflects a broader lack of research into the illness – a symptom of the misogyny embedded within modern medicine.

In recent years, a number of reports have highlighted how endometriosis significantly impacts lives beyond the immediate physical pain. In England alone, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) found a direct correlation between endometriosis and lower wages.

Out of 55,000 women, a decrease in monthly earnings was found among those aged between 25 and 54 after they received a diagnosis of endometriosis in an NHS hospital. That decrease amounted to an average of £56 per month in the four to five years following diagnosis.

Across the pond in the US, the statistics are just as disheartening. More than two-thirds of women with endometriosis are reported to have missed school or work due to pain from the condition – while Black and Hispanic women were less likely to receive an accurate diagnosis than white women.

That dietary changes might meaningfully reduce symptoms may seem like a modest breakthrough, but in the context of decades of underfunding and under-research, it represents a significant shift.

The systemic neglect of endometriosis is not incidental. It reflects a long-standing pattern in which women’s pain is deprioritised, misdiagnosed, or dismissed.

Conditions that primarily affect women are routinely under-researched and underfunded. In the UK, research into endometriosis receives a fraction of the funding allocated to conditions affecting a similar number of men, despite its high prevalence and serious impact on quality of life.

This lack of research has led to an overreliance on anecdotal evidence and a medical culture in which patients are often left to experiment with treatments on their own – whether through hormonal therapy, surgery, or, increasingly, lifestyle and diet changes. That a patient might find more insight in a social media forum than in a consultation room is indicative of a broader failure of care.

In this context, the Oxford study marks a welcome intervention. It offers formal recognition of a pattern that many sufferers have already observed anecdotally: that diet can play a role in managing symptoms. The research may help bridge the gap between patient experience and clinical evidence, something that has been sorely lacking in endometriosis care.

Of course, dietary change is not a cure. Nor is it a replacement for more comprehensive medical research, or for the development of new treatment options.

But what this study does provide is an accessible, non-invasive approach that can offer some relief while the search for more lasting interventions continues. For a condition that has historically left many people feeling powerless, that agency matters.

Accessibility