Despite improvements in some areas, the per capita spending on the transgender community remains alarmingly low. This has raised concerns about the government’s commitment to their rights.
In a country with a population of 1.4 billion people and counting – where diversity and inclusion are often celebrated – the 2024 Union Budget of India has spotlighted a glaring disparity in the allocation of funds for the transgender community.
Despite offering a nominal increase in funding for trans welfare programmes, a deeper look at the per capita spending paints an alarming picture.
The Comprehensive Rehabilitation for Welfare of Transgender Persons scheme, nestled under the SMILE (Support for Marginalized Individuals for Livelihood and Enterprise) programme, will see its allocation rise from Rs. 52.91 crores in 2024 to Rs. 68.46 crores in 2025.
At first glance, this 29 per cent increase seems positive, but when broken down, it translates to a mere Rs. 1,400 per trans person annually.
This figure has been calculated using the 2011 Census, which states there are approximately 490,000 transgender people in India (though the total is expected to be far higher, at around 12.million).
With this in mind, the conservative amount of Rs. 1,400 per trans person annually is not only inadequate, but it’s nowhere near enough to address the multifaceted challenges the community faces.
While the SMILE programme purportedly aims to fund shelters, provide scholarships, and support the National Council for Transgender Persons (NCTP), in reality, these objectives are not being met.
This is according to reports which show that most shelters (known in India as Garima Grehs) have been forced to shut down for financial reasons.
A safe space for transgender individuals – many of whom are facing rejection from their own families and society at large – the closure of these facilities leaves an already vulnerable community even more at risk of falling victim to homelessness or exploitation.
Similarly, the NCTP, which was established to advise the government on policies and legislation related to trans rights, is reportedly barely functional.
This is both hindering the development of effective strategies to bolster equality for all and limiting the presence of trans voices in decision-making processes.