Menu Menu
[gtranslate]

Hunger is at the heart of Indian farmers’ protests

Throughout history, protesters in India have been congregating in the streets to perform mass movements of solidarity against human rights offences and political policies which don’t prioritise the wellbeing of the nation’s people.

Over the years we’ve seen impressive gatherings of people protesting in India.

From indigenous peoples to students, and even bull tamers, the diversity of attendees demonstrates that the people of India are not afraid to push back on their government.

Perhaps most impressive of all was the protest led by Indian farmers in December 2020, which was identified at the time as the largest peaceful protest in world history.

It was made up of students, civil society groups, and farmers, all opposing three new agricultural laws which would allow farmers to negotiate with corporate companies.

Despite these new laws seeming to bring India a step closer to agricultural autonomy, in reality the new bills involved the retraction of government subsidies.

Authorities were essentially overlooking farmers’ capacity to manage their own trade. They also ignored the fact that many marginalised farmers lacked the negotiation power or skills to carry out deals that would become necessary if these new bills were introduced.

In response, protesters demanded the creation of a minimum support price (MSP) bill to ensure that corporations couldn’t control industry prices.

After eleven rounds of talks between India’s central government and farmers’ unions, the proposed bills were stayed in January 2021. In November of the same year the union government repealed the bills.

Both houses of Parliament in India (the “Lok Sabha” and the “Rajya Sabha”) passed the Farm Laws Repeal Bill on 29 November 2021 after more than a year of protests.

Farmers’ unions in India have continued to demand guaranteed minimum support prices (MSPs) ever since.

By setting a price floor for certain crops, this would effectively protect farmers from sharp drops in prices and ensure that they receive a minimum income for their produce even in low seasons.

Now, Indian farmers are staging protests again.

President of Bhartiya Kisan Union Ekta Sidhupur, 70 year old Jagit Singh Dallewal, has taken on an indefinite hunger strike.

Having fasted since 26th November 2024, the farmer leader eventually accepted medical aid on Saturday night (18th January 2025) after the government delegation met with him and invited protesting farmers for talks in February.

From the 15th of January, 121 additional farmers had begun a hunger strike in solidarity with Dallewal.

They collectively ended their fast after the talks were confirmed, but Dallewal himself has vowed to continue his fast until the farmers’ demands are met.

 

Five years after the monumental watershed moment in Indian Farmers’ political autonomy, the farmers are still striking for assured prices on certain crops, loan waivers, and compensation for the families of farmers who died during earlier protests.

Unsurprisingly, these protests and hunger strikes, like that of Dallewal and the 121 other farmers fasting in solidarity, are a justified response to the governments’ failure to fulfil farmers’ demands in 2020.

Before India’s Centre government extended an invitation for talks, India’s federal government had seemed to distance itself from the protests, exacerbating the situation and continuing to ignore farmers’ rights and demands.

Dallewal’s extreme form of protest has placed his current health under serious risk, despite being administered with intravenous fluids.

That said, this isn’t the first time citizens have embarked on a hunger strike to protest their rights in India.

In 2011 Anna Hazare, an anti-corruption activist, fasted in New Delhi to protest the Jan Lokpal Bill.

This bill would appoint the independent body Jan Lokpal to investigate corruption cases, complete the investigation within a year, and conduct trials for the case within the following year.

Hazare’s activism led to the resignation of Agriculture Minister Sharad Pawar from the group of ministers reviewing the draft bill. Unfortunately, despite his success, the Lokpal Bill was passed in 2013.

Nevertheless, Hazare’s hunger strike provoked a nationwide protest led by India Against Corruption. He was congratulated by the anti-corruption body last week.

Hunger strikes were also used as a form of protest in 2014 by students demanding an investigation into the assault of a female student on Jadavpur University campus.

The police brutality that was enacted in response to the strikes evoked a wave of protests, causing the university’s vice chancellor to resign from his position after almost 100 students refused to take their degrees.

As Abhimanyu Kotra, the general secretary of the Bharatiya Kisan Union, has commented, the farmers’ hunger strikes this time round have meant that “the government had to finally blink “ by agreeing to partake in talks.

Hunger strikes have proven an effective form of protest in India in response to a variety of political injustices, in part due to the fundamental role food plays in the formation and celebration of Indian culture and identity.

 

The cause has also been propped up the trending hashtag accompanying the farmers’ movement.

It encapsulates not only why this movement is so important to every single person in India, but the inextricable link that exists between food, community, and politics.

This time, Indian police and government authorities might not be firing tear gas at peaceful protesters or blocking roads like in 2020.

But Dellawel’s health is still at ever increasing risk the longer his protest continues, and the decision by union ministers to withhold the talks until 14 February is yet another insidious example of governmental harm.

Gurmeet Singh Khuddian, the Punjab Agriculture Minister, has advised that the meeting be held earlier than the preestablished date and has welcomed union ministers to resume talks as early as possible.

While #nofarmersnofoodnofuture might only apply to farmers like Dellawel and the 121 other people hunger striking, Indian politicians will continue to risk the country’s agricultural livelihood and the wellbeing of the nation’s people if they refuse to meet farmers’ demands.

Accessibility