Menu Menu
[gtranslate]

Britain shuts its last power plant and opts for eco-friendly fuel

The last coal power plant in Britain was closed last week, marking the end of over 140 years of coal-fired electricity and the beginning of more eco-friendly fuel use in the country.

Ratcliffe-on-soar, in central England, was home to the last coal power station in the UK. After more than half a century of turning coal, it finished its final shift last Monday at midnight.

The UK government has hailed this closure as a monumental turning point in Britain’s ambitious pursuit of a renewable energy future.

This retirement marks a critical step in the Labour government’s ambitious drive to generate 100% of Britain’s energy from renewable sources by 2030.

UK Energy Minister, Michael Shanks, stated that the plant’s closure ‘marks the end of an era and coal workers can be rightly proud of their work powering our country for over 140 years.’

‘We owe generations a debt of gratitude as a country,’ he said.

‘The era of coal might be ending, but a new age of good energy jobs for our country is just beginning,’

With just over five years left on the timer, however, the vital question looms: can this bold target truly be achieved?

Whether it can or can’t be, Britain has unequivocally positioned itself as a global leader in the fight against climate change.

Technically speaking, the closure of its last coal-fired power plant has also made Britain the first of the G7 nations to fully phase out coal.

It’s not the first country to achieve this feat, though. Belgium and Sweden boast the accolade of having a coal-free present and future.

In the vast majority of energy grids across the globe, the majority of electricity is still generated through burning coal, oil, or gases. This produces powerful greenhouse cases like carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide, which blanket the Earth and trap the Sun’s heat.

The United Nations shared that fossil fuels like coal, oil, and gases account for nearly 90% of all carbon dioxide emissions.

The excessive volume of emissions contributes to rising global temperatures, accelerating the melting of polar ice caps.

Given this, Britain has taken an admirable and encouraging step towards bettering the global climate. Coal once provided 80% of Britain’s electricity in 1980, but this dropped to just 1% in 2023.

Several activists and politicians, like MP Michael Shanks, are championing the shift to renewable energy, yet the inevitable backlash of unemployment has played out as energy workers of a bygone era become surplus to requirements.

Former Plant Manager in Ratcliffe-on-sea, Peter O’Grady, said the closure was ‘an emotional day.’

‘When I started my career 36 years ago, none of us imaged a future without coal generation in our lifetimes.’

Similar concerns have risen for other big climate protection projects like the closure of Port Talbot, once the largest steelwork plant in Europe – where almost 2,000 jobs will be lost from its imminent closure.

While the transformation of the industrial landscape is undeniably for the greater good of the climate and protecting vulnerable nations, we can’t help but sympathise with the average person losing their livelihood and stability as a result of the net-zero clamour.

In the rush toward a greener future, Britain has emerged as a climate leader, setting bold targets and closing the chapter on coal.

Yet, as the country forges ahead in the global fight against climate change, the human cost of this transition cannot be ignored.

Accessibility