Menu Menu
[gtranslate]

America’s first ever climate lawsuit is won by young people

In a US-first, a group of sixteen young people took their state’s government to court over the climate crisis. They filed a lawsuit against local officials, whom they accused of violating their constitutional right to a healthy environment – and won.

At Thred, we know young people are the voice of change. That statement continued to ring truer as a group of sixteen young people led America’s first-ever court case over the worsening climate crisis.

Made up of individuals between the ages of 5 to 22, the group accused Montana’s state officials of violating their constitutional rights to exist within a healthy and environmentally safe environment.

Building the case, they pointed to Montana’s 1972 Constitution which explicitly states that current and future citizens have a right to a ‘clean and healthful environment.’ Only Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, and New York have written up this type of environmental protection in their constitutions.

Similar to what’s unfolding across the world, Montana’s air quality has been reduced as a result of increasingly frequent wildfire smoke, winter snowfall and wildlife levels are steadily depleting, and the state has seen a devastating loss of animal species.

The young plaintiffs placed the blame on their state officials, who have failed to curb greenhouse emissions. Instead they have been busy with pursuing new oil, gas and coal ventures.

In a landmark moment for climate law, they have won the case.

Julia Olson,  the executive director of Our Children’s Trust and the attorney who represented the group of young people, has called the ruling a ‘huge win for Montana, for youth, for democracy, and for our climate.’

Read the Fiery Dissent in the Children's Climate Case - The Atlantic

The lawsuit itself was first filed in the spring of 2020. It marked the first-ever climate trial in America’s history after a long series of failed attempts by other campaign groups.

That said, experts had believed that this young group would also be unlikely to succeed. Court officials refused to heighten the cases’ profile by publicly discussing it, while conservative lawmakers labelled environmental lawsuits a ‘waste of taxpayers’ money and resources.’

Still, even if the case is had been unsuccessful, it would have drawn necessary attention to Montana’s existing Environmental Policy Act. This bill requires that state agencies ‘balance the health To the delightof the environment against resource development.’

Speaking to The Guardian during the trial, Grace Gibson-Snyder, a 19-year-old plaintiff said:

‘I’m thrilled about this unique opportunity to lay out the whole story of how the government promotes fossil fuel development, how those policies exacerbate climate change, and how that in turn harms me and the other youth plaintiffs.’

How young Montana residents made a case for climate action in court | Mashable

To the delight of many, Judge Kathy Seeley of the 1st Judicial District Court in Montana found that government officials had indeed violated the rights of citizens by knowingly engaging in activities that have grossly harmed Montana’s natural environment and consequentially, its citizens.

A spokesperson for Montana attorney-general Austin Knudsen, one of the defendants in the case, has labelled the court’s ruling ‘absurd’ and revealed that the state has plans to appeal against it.

Following the win, Julia Olson said, ‘Today’s ruling in Montana is a game-changer that marks a turning point in this generation’s efforts to save the planet from the devastating effects of human-caused climate chaos.’

While its impact will be limited to the western state for now, it has potential to shape future legal decisions related to the government and the fossil fuel industry’s responsibility for contributing immensely to climate change not only across America, but maybe even other parts of the world.

Accessibility