Several major cities face stricter regulatory restrictions on annoying greenwashing tactics. Advertising agencies are being told to reconsider relationships with major polluters, and false claims of being βcarbon neutralβ and βnature positiveβ will be thwarted by marketing authorities.
Everyone blags their way through professional life to some extent, right? When it comes to the future prosperity of the planet, however, we need to be sure companies are legitimately taking action.
Wanting to appear ecologically responsible, companies have long played fast and loose with the definition of sustainability, often paying lip service with tenuous, hollow buzz phrases such as βenvironmentally friendly.β
After a barrage of lawsuits in recent years, though, it appears the advertising industry has finally reached its point of reckoning.
Within London and Brussels the era of unspecificity is about to conclude, meaning ambiguous terms like βcarbon neutralβ or βnature positiveβ will need to be ratified by regulatory organisations β such as the Advertising Standards Authority in the UK.
βMisleading environmental claims are under the microscope from advertising regulators, consumer watchdogs, and even governments,β claims Jonny White, a senior business director at marketing firm AMV BBDO.
According to a scoop from The Guardian, important industry insiders have even told advertising agencies that they must reconsider their relationships with major polluters.
Given the European Parliament voted against carbon offsetting as a valid means to reach net zero last Thursday, the goalposts are fast narrowing while the level of scrutiny is rising.
βClimate-related claims have been shown to be particularly prone to being unclear and ambiguous, misleading the consumer,β says Ben Essen, global chief strategy officer at Iris Worldwide.