Menu Menu
[gtranslate]

US prosecutors reopen Cornell University gang rape case

The alleged incident took place on university grounds in 2024. Cornell has yet to comment publicly.

On Tuesday, the names and faces of seven Cornell University students flooded the internet. They were all young men. And they were all allegedly involved in the gang rape of a woman on campus in 2024.

Jane Doe initially came forward shortly after the incident was said to have happened, telling Cornell University Police on 8 November 2024. She has now filed a civil lawsuit alleging she was drugged and raped by multiple people at a fraternity house at the university on 19 October 2024.

At the time of the assault two years ago, the victim claims university staff and authorities did nothing to intervene, and the institution has remained publicly quiet on the ongoing situation.

Part of the lawsuit contains an image purported to be from a Snapchat fraternity group chat, in which one of the seven young men – being named online as ‘the Cornell 7’ – alerted other members of the group of the potential to join in on the sexual assault of Jane Doe.

The former student is now suing the school and the Chi Pi fraternity members, claiming they failed to protect her and prevent the alleged attack. Jane Doe was only 20 years old at the time, and had visited Cornell’s Chi Pi fraternity with a friend while intoxicated.

She alleges two young men pressured her into taking drugs before they assaulted her for several hours.

The university conducted an internal investigation following the claims, but of the seven men accused, only two were expelled while the others received lesser sanctions including suspensions, workshops or essays.

New York state prosecutors said that evidence at the time did not meet the legal threshold to bring charges, but that due to differing details in the new civil lawsuit, the case would now be brought before a grand jury.

‘Jane Doe’s sworn statement in November of 2024 did not allege that she was drugged against her will or gang raped,’ Tompkins County District Attorney Matthew Van Houten said Monday.

‘On the contrary, Jane Doe’s statement described her participation in drug use and sexual conduct as voluntary, conscious and consensual.’

He went on to acknowledge that ‘the reality that it can take years of therapy and healing for victims of sexual assaults to fully process or understand what happened to them.’

‘Once we determine the appropriate charges, the case will be prosecuted in the most objective and impartial means possible,’ through a grand jury, Tompkins County District Attorney Matthew Van Houten said Monday.

One of the most disturbing details of this case is the fact that the alleged perpetrators shared details of the assault on a Snapchat group which included more than fifty male students. Not one reported the crude language or suggestion of sexual violence to authorities.

This also adds a layer of complexity in bringing criminal charges. Many members of the public are condemning the silence of those involved, but knowing how to punish them in a legal sense is less straightforward when the details of the incident were shared on a sprawling online forum.

The district attorney’s office has said it did not see the Snapchat messages before the civil lawsuit was filed. Jane Doe’s lawyer, however, has disputed this, saying the messages were provided to Cornell police during the original investigation. The disagreement over when authorities became aware of the messages could now become significant as prosecutors reassess the evidence.

The reopening of the case does not mean that the seven men have been criminally charged. Instead, prosecutors will present evidence to a grand jury, which will consider whether there is sufficient basis for an indictment. The allegations made in the civil lawsuit also remain allegations, rather than findings of criminal guilt.

For Cornell, the case raises questions beyond the alleged assault itself: what responsibility universities have when sexual violence is reported on campus, how investigations should respond when an account changes or develops over time, and what should happen when students appear to know about potential abuse but do not report it.

All this, of course, is heightened and warped in the age of social media.

The university has said it supports the renewed criminal investigation. For now, the focus will return to the evidence, with prosecutors expected to present the case to a grand jury as they reconsider what happened nearly two years ago.

And amidst all of this remains a woman who was brave enough to come forward and share her account, knowing the scrutiny that would follow. The allegations against the Cornell Seven have yet to be tested in court, but we absolutely must ensure that those who report sexual violence are able to be heard without being drowned out by speculation, tribalism, or a media circus.

Enjoyed this? Click here for more Gen Z focused change stories.

Accessibility