Menu Menu
[gtranslate]

Addressing youth mental health in conflict zones

For communities living through ongoing conflict, mental health is not a separate crisis. It is built into the conditions of everyday life.

At present, there are 61 active conflicts happening across the globe.

So, let’s not dress this up in a polite way: communities grappling with constant wars and hostilities aren’t just struggling when it comes to mental health, they are in the midst of a full-fledged psychological crisis.

In Palestine, recurring cycles of violence have caused widespread trauma, especially among the youth. In Syria, more than a decade of war has left entire populations experiencing displacement, loss, and mental distress. Globally, we love talking about post-conflict recovery, trauma healing, rebuilding lives. But, some of these countries never got the courtesy of being ‘post’ anything.

In fact, even after conflict has come to an end, the population suffers from aftermath effects such as PTSD. Even in regions such as Bosnia and Herzegovina, years after violence has formally ceased, the psychological aftermath continues to shape everyday life.

This is the reality of a society where violence and uncertainty become the background noise of everyday life, and mental health isn’t exactly at the top of the priority list. Here, the human brain does not just ‘get used to it’; it adapts, surely, but more like a phone that’s been on 1% battery the whole time. Surviving, but not exactly thriving.

Mental health services in conflict zones are overwhelmed, and that is just based on the people who actually show up. There are people who don’t, people who don’t have access, people who would rather suffer silently than be judged. The scale of this ordeal tends to be more worrying than what’s recorded.

In Kashmir, clinics that once saw a manageable number of patients now deal with hundreds every single day. We’re talking about a place where one in every five adults lives with PTSD and nearly every young individual reports distress.

Even though this is a massive policy red flag, institutional response remains slow, fragmented, and underwhelming.

Gen Z are in a particularly brutal position. Around the world, 224 million children in crisis-impacted countries are out of school. In states such as Syria, Sudan, and Ukraine, families have been displaced numerous times, making it impossible for children to study consistently. In Gaza, over 97% of schools have been destroyed by Israeli forces.

Rather than building identities, careers, and social lives, they are instead dealing with disrupted education, unemployment, and constant uncertainty. Schools close regularly, and childhood gets interrupted in ways that are not easy to reverse.

Exposure to violence, loss without closure, humiliation, fear, unpredictability are only some of the traumatic incidents that young people have had to experience. Even those who haven’t directly experienced an event carry it through family and community. This type of sustained exposure changes how people think, feel, and react.

Many even look for coping mechanisms that may turn into substance abuse, potential withdrawal, or even a quiet burnout that no one diagnoses properly.

To paint you a picture of how mental health care is provided in crisis-affected regions, community-based care is minimal, referral systems are inconsistent, and emergency mental health support is unreliable. And then there is the financial barrier, which filters out the very people who need help the most.

Even if stigma disappeared overnight and everyone decided to seek help, the system would not be able to cope; there simply aren’t enough trained professionals. In addition, services are concentrated in urban areas while rural communities are left with little to nothing. Besides, primary healthcare workers often lack the training to identify or treat mental health conditions.

The golden standard is that mental health is supposed to be part of primary healthcare. Even so, it is still treated like a separate, specialised issue, which only reinforces the idea that seeking help is something unusual or extreme. This is where things get uncomfortable because of stigma. People with mental health issues are often dismissed, judged, or ridiculed, which becomes internalised; people start believing they are weak or flawed for struggling.

Women are especially vulnerable due to excessive caring responsibilities and the risk of sexual violence. Gender norms exacerbate this as women risk being perceived as unsuitable for marriage and men believe they are failing at some invisible test of strength or manhood.

Rather than seeking medical support, a large portion may resort to supernatural or spiritual explanations to their symptoms, which feel more socially acceptable. When psychological illnesses are misunderstood in this way, people push receiving treatment, making recovery further out of reach.

Once unemployment is added into the mix and young people complete their education, they find themselves with no clear path ahead. This lack of opportunity impacts not only their income, but also their identity and purpose.

People withdraw from social life, feel misunderstood or isolated, and begin questioning their worth and their future prospects. And then it loops: poor mental health makes securing or retaining a job seem like a far-fetched prospect, which damages mental health further.

Education interruptions render this worse. When students miss out on core years of schooling, graduate late or lack in key skill areas, their chances in the job market deteriorate substantially.

If institutional response is limited to clinical interventions, this ordeal is going to persist. At this point, offering individual therapy without addressing the socio-economic effects of a crisis would be like putting a plaster on something that needs proper repair.

Mental health services are crucial, but are only one piece of the puzzle because without treating stigma, infrastructure gaps, and economic conditions, the effects of these services will constantly be minimal and transient.

What is required is a coordinated mechanism which addresses mental health as an element of a wider system. This involves combining it into primary care, thereby increasing accessibility and reducing stigma simultaneously. Expanding community-based support will ensure that people are not pushed into traversing long distances and providing frontline workers with training to identify and respond to mental health problems early.

To resolve this, mental health policy should be made a priority at regional levels. Additionally, improving people’s socioeconomic conditions must be prioritised in order to sustain youth wellbeing by working towards skill development and capacity building initiatives.

If this continues to be treated as a secondary issue, the long-term consequences will not just be higher rates of mental illness, but also the slow erosion of a generation’s potential, leading to irreparable damage.

Enjoyed this? Click here for more Gen Z focused change stories.

Accessibility