Menu Menu
[gtranslate]

TikTok wants you to fact-check your For You Page

With its new ‘footnotes’ feature, the platform is betting on crowdsourced context to clean up the chaos of viral video culture. 

TikTok’s endless scroll has always been a cocktail of brilliance, absurdity, and the occasional conspiracy theory. For every dance challenge or cooking hack, there’s a dubious wellness tip promising to fix your gut in three days or a breaking news claim with no evidence beyond a shaky iPhone video.

The company knows this – and after heavy-handed backlash from users, it now seems to be  rolling out a solution: ‘Footnotes’, a feature designed to crowdsource context and fact-checks, launched in the U.S. last month.

Footnotes is essentially TikTok’s answer to ‘Community Notes’ on X – short, user-written clarifications that appear beneath posts when there’s a need for additional context. But instead of Elon Musk’s often chaotic experiment with digital truth-telling, TikTok is framing Footnotes as a way to inject clarity and accountability into a platform notorious for viral misinfo.

Around 80,000 TikTok users have already signed up to write and rate Footnotes. When someone leaves a note on a video – say, linking to a reputable news source, other users can vote on whether the note is helpful. If a few agree, the Footnote goes live under the video for everyone else to see.

It’s a kind of peer-review system for the For You Page. And like any good peer-review system, it’s self-correcting: users can also report Footnotes they think are misleading or off-base, and TikTok says the tool will get smarter as more people use it.

In theory, this adds a second layer of visibility. Not just what’s going viral, but what’s verifiably true.

The timing isn’t accidental. TikTok is under pressure on several fronts: political scrutiny in the US, accusations of fueling misinformation during elections and global crises, and an increasingly skeptical user base.

According to The Verge, the company has been testing iterations of Footnotes since 2022, but the full-scale rollout suggests TikTok is ready to lean into the idea of community-driven credibility.

The New York Times noted that the launch comes as platforms everywhere are reckoning with the failures of traditional fact-checking models. Centralized moderation teams simply can’t keep up with the velocity of content, let alone the creative ways misinformation slips through. TikTok’s bet is that distributed, crowdsourced vigilance might succeed where top-down policing has stalled.

But the system isn’t without its flaws. Community Notes on X have already shown how easily consensus can be weaponized by ideological bias. If the majority of users reviewing a note lean toward one worldview, does the system risk amplifying that bias under the guise of neutrality?

TikTok insists it has guardrails – Footnotes must cite reliable sources, and moderation tools exist to weed out abuse. But is it realistic that a platform built on speed and spectacle can slow itself down for the sake of contextualisation?

Despite the risks, there’s something oddly appealing about Footnotes. It taps into the same collective intelligence that makes Wikipedia work: imperfect, but surprisingly resilient. And accessible.

Democratising information in this way might be the same reason misinformation spreads in the first place, but it also creates an environment for discussion and nuance – something sorely lacking in our current socio-political system.

Context isn’t just about stopping harm; it’s about ‘enriching digital discourse.’ And that’s powerful in a moment where trust in the media is so fragile.

Footnotes is TikTok’s bid to make its infinite scroll just a little smarter, a little clearer, and maybe even a little safer. Whether it works will depend less on the platform’s algorithms than on the willingness of users to play along.

TikTok thrives on collective participation, so why not extend that energy to truth-telling? If it works, the feature could turn viral videos into not just entertainment, but annotated cultural artifacts – in all their messy, layered reality.

Accessibility