Menu Menu
[gtranslate]

Jeanpormanove’s live death ignites outrage at Kick

French streamer Raphaël Graven, better known as Jeanpormanove, died on stream this week following a 10-day marathon in which he was subjected to sleep deprivation and physical abuse. How did Kick fail to recognise the danger?

The death of French streamer Jeanpormanove has had a profound impact online, and it must spark serious accountability.

The 46-year-old streamer passed during a live Kick broadcast and laid undiscovered for over 50 minutes beside sleeping associates in a Contes apartment. During this time, the live chat continued and viewers poured in.

A judicial investigation is now officially underway, and an autopsy will be performed on the former soldier to discover the exact cause of death. For many of those familiar with the nature of Jeanpormanove’s content, however, the tragic outcome doesn’t come as a huge surprise.

Jeanpormanove, who has over one million followers across his social media platforms, was known for extreme content – primarily marathon streams, in which he was subjected to sleep deprivation and physical abuse from his co-creators.

From 2023 onwards, Jeanpormanove was sporadically and regularly manhandled by multiple people, choked, forced to ingest dangerous substances, and shot with a paintball gun -among other countless horrible acts now making the rounds on X.

It was implied by channel regulars, namely Owen Cenazandotti and Safine Hamadi, that Jeanpormanove voluntarily placed this duress on himself, but this version of events is proving vastly unpopular on social media.

Many are suggesting Jeanpormanove was a vulnerable person who was exploited and blackmailed to remain as the channel’s whipping boy. Owen has since ignited further public fury in an Instagram post paying tribute to his late ‘brother, sidekick, and partner.’

Disturbingly, audience donations to the channel were abundant, and it had been earning approximately £2,000 per day (based on estimates from its 10,000 average viewership). Screenshots of the chat on the morning of Jeanpormanove’s death are even more concerning and expose the type of viewer his channel was attracting.

Having just become aware of the channel in the last 24 hours, I’m both disgusted and baffled at how this viral humiliation was not only permitted on Kick, but how it propelled the channel to among the platform’s top earners in France.

Kick claims to be ‘urgently reviewing’ the questionable circumstances around the streamer’s death and has rolled out the following statement:

‘We are deeply saddened by the loss of Jean Pormanove and extend our condolences to his family, friends and community. We are urgently reviewing the circumstances and engaging with relevant stakeholders to investigate the situation. Kick’s community guidelines are designed to protect creators, and we remain committed to upholding these standards across our platform.’

This attempt at placation is going down about as well as you’d expect. Viewers and advocacy groups had repeatedly raised concerns about the ‘trash style’ USP of the channel, and barring a couple of short-lived bans in 2024, it had been business as usual right up to Graven’s death.

Concern had been so palpable, that the Nice Public Prosecutor’s Office opened a formal investigation in January 2025 on suspicions including intentional violence against vulnerable persons, endangerment, and broadcasting violent content.

Eight months later, we’re potentially dealing with the worst-case scenario. And while French officials are remaining impartial throughout their investigation, the court of public opinion is hellbent on punishment.

On this note, if Graven’s passing is proven to be anything other than a sad coincidence, the role of Kick as a facilitator simply cannot be ignored

The platform’s lax approach to moderation is not only dangerous, but entirely deliberate. Brand safety seems bottom of its list of priorities, and it’s become the ‘wild west’ of streaming where almost anything goes – and violence, in particular, is rife.

By design, it has pitched itself against more heavily moderated rivals like YouTube and Twitch with light boundaries, and many believe its ties to gambling site Stake.com are the reason why. Rapid growth and user acquisition takes clear precedence over ethics, and a quick glance at Kick’s top 30 streamers will tell you everything you need to know.

Supporters laud Kick for empowering creators with freedom and competition against Twitch’s effective monopoly, but the downside is being highlighted with unnerving regularity in 2025. Bear in mind that Kick’s primary audience is even younger than that of Twitch.

Between this tragic news, and all the constant fighting, sexual smut, homophobia, and racism, surely, it’s about time the authorities put Kick under the spotlight.

Accessibility