Menu Menu
[gtranslate]

Isn’t it time for men to decenter women?

Many straight men struggle to form close relationships with one another without relying on a female intermediary. Perhaps it’s time for them to take a leaf out of women’s books and assume responsibility for dismantling the patriarchal systems which are negatively impacting their mental health. 

Whether you’ve been long acquainted with the idea, or you’re delving into ‘decentring men’ for the first time – maybe you even first came across the term in my previous article – there is no doubt that the anti-, or at least ‘side-stepping around men’ discourse has once again entered the cultural zeitgeist.

While this political response is certainly a valid one in the current cultural climate, haven’t women already largely done the work of decentering men?

Aren’t the historical and ongoing strength of female friendships, women’s rejection of heterosexual dating compared with the higher rates of (visible) lesbian couples, or even the growing female representation in films which pass the Bechdel Test, a testament to this?

Women may still be suffering under patriarchal structures. Indeed, many of us may be complicit in their perpetuation at the expense of other women (particularly those of us who benefit from the devalued service labour of women in a lower social-status). Certainly, we’re a long way from emancipation.

Yet, women’s ability to decenter men, if the South-Korean 4B movement or the donning of Suffragette sashes by female MPs are anything to go by, perhaps isn’t the issue. Even if the backlash against feminism that we’re currently witnessing is more than a little alarming.

Maybe, then, it’s men who need to shoulder some of the responsibility for the insidious continuation of oppressive patriarchal structures.

Evidently, it’s not enough (for anyone, of any gender) for men to build homosocial bonds which, as Eve Kosofsky Segwick has written, allow them to protect and maintain their networks of power in order to sustain patriarchal privilege.

If the male loneliness epidemic is anything to go by, men’s seeming inability to decenter women from their own lives – whether as an object of desire of as a subjugated servant –  is contributing to a crisis of masculinity and apparently concomitant state of poor mental health for young men.

While women are more likely to have more close friends and larger social networks than men, almost 15% of men report having no close friends at all.

Meanwhile, so-called ‘dating coaches’ are profiting off of men’s loneliness, as they preach – wrongly – that the only kind of men women want is a masculine one. They postulate that ‘real’ men don’t need to express their emotions, rather they need to up their protein, their weights, and their body count.

Only then, once they’ve made all of the relationships available to them transactional, will they be happy.

 

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Professor Neil (@professor_neil)

If men do hang out together, it’s often more about chilling out than catching up, over a screen and a pint, or whilst spotting and lifting, usually with banter-based conversation rather than a deeper, more intentional chat.

How many times have you asked a man about how his night with his male friend was, only to have your questions about his friend’s wellbeing met with vague responses and “I don’t know, I didn’t ask”?

Hence why, as many modern women have chosen to reject forms of patriarchal conditioning which presents mandatory participation in heteronormative relationships as the norm, it’s not their mental health that’s suffering as a part of intentional singlehood.

Perhaps part of the reason why men are struggling is because their behaviour still reflects a model of masculinity predicated upon a binary social expectation of female subservience and attraction in exchange for unsolicited male protection and provision from a paradoxically male-cultivated threat.

Since many modern women are now, for the first time rejecting this model since being granted ‘the social and economic opportunity to choose singlehood,’ many men are left wondering where they fit if it’s not in a man-shaped hole that women have left open for them.

What we need, then, is more men forming relationships with one another. Not to protect gendered hierarchies or in order to strategise how to pick up and use women to satisfy only their own needs.

Rather, men need to start centering themselves in their discussions with one another. Not in a neoliberal, individualistic way, but in a collective community that allows men to forge solidarity and construct an identity that’s not based on what they’re not, or in opposition to what they must be “more than”.

Rather, like many women’s healthy social networks, men need more positive endorsement from one another of what they, as people rather than as men, can offer and reciprocate to one another.

There is a problem, of course, with me, a woman, writing this article and commenting on the manosphere and constructions of – let’s not call it masculinity but rather a more gender neutral ‘identity’ – in the hopes of impressing to men that if they want to improve their relationships with women then they need to improve their relationships with men.

That is, if you’ll forgive the cliché, that the only person it’s impossible to decenter from the narrative you construct is yourself.

Accessibility