Menu Menu
[gtranslate]

Sweden says children under 2 should have zero screen time

Swedish health authorities have issued new recommendations to restrict screen time for young people. 

Sweden has made a firm statement in the ongoing debate over children and screens: for kids under two, there should be no screen time. At all.

Health authorities have issued new recommendations for parents regarding screen time for young people. For ages two to five, it’s limited to an hour a day, and for children six to twelve, a maximum of two hours.

The suggestions may sound extreme, but they come as part of a growing global concern about the effects of digital devices on young minds.

It’s not news that screens may significantly interfere with essential early development. Research suggests that too much screen time could stunt social skills, slow cognitive growth, and replace more valuable activities like playing with toys, reading, or simply interacting with humans.

Similar recommendations have come out of other countries as well, including the United States, Ireland, Canada, Australia, and France.

France currently has the strictest suggestions, stating that children under the age of 3 should have no screen time at all.

In 2023, UNESCO reported that while digital technology can aid education through new learning environments and expanded collaboration, it comes at a cost to socialisation and real-life learning.

Of course, these guidelines haven’t gone over smoothly with everyone. A quick scroll through Reddit or any parenting forum shows an expected mix of frustration and eye-rolls.

Many parents, juggling work, household duties, and the demands of daily life, argue that some form of screen time is essential.

‘If you have multiple children, you get it. My son and daughter spend 80% of their time playing with us, or outside, or in some sort of planned social activity. F**** you if you tell me that I’m a bad parent for letting them watch a Disney movie, or an animal show, when I need 30-60 minutes to take care of myself’ said one user.

Others have argued the issue is more complex than a blanket ‘recommendation’ can account for.

‘There’s a difference between giving your kid an iPad (don’t) and putting on educational content for a little while so you don’t go manic’.

‘Millennial parents acting like they weren’t raised on Nickelodeon, WB, and Cartoon Network, followed-up by Toonami when they were older. We weren’t any better, but we turned out okay because our parents still struck a balance by occasionally kicking us out of the house to go play with neighbor kids, school sports, or other alternative activities like Scouts.’

It’s not just about convenience, though. Digital tools have become part of early education in many countries, including Sweden.

Kids today often start using tablets and computers in school, learning everything from math to reading on digital platforms. For some parents, the idea of zero screen time before the age of two seems disconnected from how the modern world works.

Sweden’s decision might seem extreme to parents in countries like the United States, where screens are often seen as inevitable. But in other nations, especially in Asia, concerns about ‘digital addiction’ have led to similar or even stricter measures.

In South Korea, for instance, the government has rolled out initiatives to address excessive screen use among children, recognizing the potential long-term risks.

The question is whether this approach can make a real difference or if it’s simply too difficult to enforce in a world dominated by screens.

Whether or not parents agree with the recommendations, one thing is clear: managing screen time has become a new parenting battleground. The rise of smartphones, tablets, and smart TVs has made it nearly impossible to avoid screen exposure altogether.

Sweden’s guidelines may be well-intentioned, but for many families, they can feel out of touch. The assumption that parents can always entertain, educate, or supervise without the help of technology ignores the realities of life.

But considering the long-term effects of screen time on young people, it’s no surprise that stringent recommendations are being put forward. Last year, dozens of US states, including California and New York, sued Meta for harming young people and contributing to the youth mental health crisis by knowingly designing features that addict children.

Now, Sweden’s public health agency has called for tech companies to change their algorithms so children do not get stuck doom-scrolling for hours or watching harmful content.

For now, Sweden’s move highlights how fast technology has upended parenting. Whether these guidelines will spark a global trend or just fuel more internet debates is anyone’s guess.

Accessibility